Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance^†

Economic and Market Conditions

Municipal bonds declined early in the 12-month period beginning December 1, 2024, as optimism following the first Federal Reserve (Fed) rate cut faded despite historically strong seasonal technicals and reduced supply.

December reversed the gains recorded following the election of President Trump. The typical year-end “Santa Claus” rally failed to materialize, and municipals posted their first negative December in over a decade. Despite a constructive supply backdrop, a hawkish Fed rate cut on December 18 and tempered expectations for 2025 easing pushed Treasury yields sharply higher. By late December, markets had repriced from expecting ten cuts across 2024–2025 to just two in 2025, following 100 basis points (bps) of cuts during 2024 amid a firm labor market and persistent inflation.

From January through April 2025, volatility dominated. Economic uncertainty, tax policy debates, and negative seasonal technicals drove yields higher across high-grade municipals. April brought exceptional turbulence after President Trump’s Liberation Day trade policy announcement introduced global growth uncertainty. On April 9 and 10, the municipal market recorded its two largest single-day index moves in opposite directions, as measured by the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index (the Index): -2.0% followed by +2.9%.

From May through July, persistent macro headwinds restrained fixed-income performance. President Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” drove long-end rates higher as markets questioned the impact of an additional $2.4 trillion in projected deficits over the next decade. Combined with ongoing tariff uncertainty, the policy outlook shifted from expected rate cuts to a wait-and-see stance.

In September, the market strengthened as renewed Fed easing and supportive technicals drove yields lower. Despite supply being 30% above the five-year average, reinvestment flows and inflows into municipal funds supported a 2.32% gain for the month. Treasury yields also declined on signs of labor market cooling, but municipals outperformed as yield curve dynamics favored tax-exempt securities. Municipals rallied further with the municipal market posting strong gains in October as well, marking the best October performance since 1995 as the Index advanced 1.24%. Both Treasury and municipal curves flattened over the two-month period, with the spread between the 2-year and 30-year maturities (commonly referred to as the 2s30s spread) ending at +169 bps for municipals versus +107 bps for Treasuries.

The municipal market delivered muted performance in November following October’s strong rally. Gross issuance totaled $40.7 billion, roughly $10 billion less than October but still the highest November on record, surpassing 2017’s prior peak. Year-to-date supply continues to run well ahead of historical norms, about +16% versus 2024 and +29% above the five-year average, yet the market absorbed the elevated volume with relative ease as the curve held largely steady.

For the full period, the Index returned 2.64%. Performance was led by the short end of the curve, where yields declined and prices rose for bonds maturing within ten years. In contrast, longer maturities (20–30 years) underperformed as yields rose and prices fell. During a period with investor demand concentrated in short-duration and higher-quality credits, lower-quality municipal bonds underperformed, with the Bloomberg High Yield Municipal Bond Index returning just 1.00%.

Fund Performance

For the 12-month period ended November 30, 2025, Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust (the Fund) returned 0.41% at net asset value of its common shares (NAV), underperforming its benchmark, the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index (the Index), which returned 2.64%.

The Fund’s investment objective is to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax. The Fund pursues this objective by investing primarily in investment-grade municipal securities. The Fund may also invest a portion of its assets in higher-risk, higher-yielding municipal securities of lesser quality.

The Fund's managers may employ leverage through tender option bond (TOB) financing to seek to enhance tax-exempt income potential. The use of leverage has the effect of achieving additional exposure to the municipal bond market, magnifying the Fund's exposure to its underlying investments in both up and down markets.

Detractors from Index-relative performance included the Fund’s use of TOB leverage, an overweight position in bonds with 22 years or more remaining to maturity, and security selections in bonds with 4% coupon rates.

In contrast, contributors to Fund performance relative to the Index included an allocation to taxable municipal bonds, an overweight position and security selection in zero coupon bonds, and an overweight position and security selections in the transportation sector.

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated net of management fees and other expenses by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested in accordance with the Fund’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan. Furthermore, returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that shareholders may have to pay on Fund distributions or upon the sale of Fund shares. Performance at market price will differ from performance at NAV due to variations in the Fund’s market price versus NAV, which may reflect factors such as fluctuations in supply and demand for Fund shares, changes in Fund distributions, shifting market expectations for the Fund’s future returns and distribution rates, and other considerations affecting the trading prices of closed-end funds. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance for periods less than or equal to one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, current Fund performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month-end, please refer to eatonvance.com.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance^† — continued

Fund Distributions

The Fund intends to make regular monthly cash distributions to its common shareholders (stated in terms of a fixed amount per common share dividend distribution rate). The Fund’s ability to maintain its declared distribution amount will depend on a number of factors, including: the amount and stability of investment income earned by the Fund; the performance of the Fund’s investments; the Fund’s expenses; underlying market conditions; realized and projected returns; and other factors. There can be no assurance that an unanticipated change in market conditions or other factors will not result in a change in the Fund’s distributions at a future time. To maintain the Fund’s monthly distribution rate, the Fund may distribute more than its net investment income and net realized capital gains and, therefore, distributions may include a return of capital. The Fund’s monthly distributions had no effect on the Fund’s investment strategy during the most recent fiscal year and are not expected to have an effect in future periods, but distributions in excess of Fund returns will cause its per share NAV to erode. Investors should not draw any conclusions about the Fund’s investment performance from the amount of its monthly distributions.

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Performance

Portfolio Manager(s) Cynthia J. Clemson and William J. Delahunty, CFA

% Average Annual Total Returns^1,2	Inception Date	One Year	Five Years	Ten Years
Fund at NAV	01/29/1999	0.41%	(0.22)%	3.29%
Fund at Market Price	—	7.13	1.15	3.04

Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index	—	2.64%	0.91%	2.41%

% Premium/Discount to NAV³
As of period end	0.37%

Distributions⁴
Total Distributions per share for the period	$0.62
Distribution Rate at NAV	5.67%
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at NAV	9.58
Distribution Rate at Market Price	5.65
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at Market Price	9.54

% Total Leverage⁵
Residual Interest Bond (RIB) Financing	31.54%

Growth of $10,000

This graph shows the change in value of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in the Fund for the period indicated. For comparison, the same investment is shown in the indicated index.

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

The Fund's Investment Objectives, Principal Strategies and Principal Risks^‡

Investment Objective. The Fund’s investment objective is to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax.

Principal Strategies. During normal market conditions, substantially all of the Fund’s total assets (at least 80%) will be invested in debt obligations issued by or on behalf of states, territories and possessions of the United States, and the District of Columbia and their political subdivisions, agencies or instrumentalities, the interest on which is exempt from regular federal income tax (“municipal obligations”). At least 65% of the Fund’s total assets normally will be invested in municipal obligations rated at least investment grade at the time of investment (which are those rated Baa3 or higher by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or BBB- or higher by either S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”) or Fitch Ratings, Inc. (“Fitch”)), or, if unrated, determined by Eaton Vance Management (“EVM”) to be of at least investment grade quality. From time to time, the Fund may hold a significant amount of municipal obligations not rated by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“Rating Agency”). When the Fund invests in unrated municipal obligations, it may be more dependent on EVM’s research capabilities than when it invests in rated municipal obligations.

The Fund may invest up to 35% of its total assets in municipal obligations rated below investment grade by each of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch (but no more than 30% of total assets may be rated lower than B by each of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch) and unrated municipal obligations considered to be of comparable quality by EVM. For purposes of rating restrictions, if an instrument is rated differently by the Rating Agencies, the higher rating is used. The Fund will not purchase securities that are in default at the time of purchase.

The Fund may purchase and sell derivative instruments, which derive their value from another instrument, security or index, including financial futures contracts and related options based on various debt securities and securities indices, as well as interest rates swaps and forward rate contracts, to seek to hedge against changes in interest rates, as a substitute for the purchase of securities or for other risk management purposes. The Fund also may invest in residual interest bonds of a trust (the “trust”) that holds municipal securities. The trust will also issue floating-rate notes to third parties that may be senior to the Fund’s residual interest.

Except for certain fundamental investment restrictions set forth in the Fund’s registration statement and the 80% requirement set forth above, the investment objective and policies of the Fund may be changed by the Board without shareholder action.

The Fund employs leverage to seek opportunities for additional income. Leverage may amplify any increase or decrease in the value of investments held by the Fund. The Fund generally will not use leverage if the investment adviser anticipates that it would result in a lower return to shareholders for any significant amount of time. There can be no assurance that the use of leverage will be successful.

Principal Risks

Market Discount Risk. As with any security, the market value of the Fund’s common shares may increase or decrease from the amount initially paid for the common shares. The Fund’s common shares have traded both at a premium and at a discount relative to NAV. The shares of closed-end management investment companies frequently trade at a discount from their NAV. This is a risk separate and distinct from the risk that the Fund’s NAV may decrease.

Investment and Market Risk. An investment in the Fund’s common shares is subject to investment risk, including the possible loss of the entire principal amount invested. An investment in common shares represents an indirect investment in the securities owned by the Fund, which will generally trade in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) markets. The common shares at any point in time may be worth less than the original investment, even after taking into account any reinvestment of distributions.

The value of investments held by the Fund may increase or decrease in response to social, economic, political, financial, public health crises or other disruptive events (whether real, expected or perceived) in the U.S. and global markets and include events such as war, natural disasters, epidemics and pandemics, terrorism, conflicts and social unrest. These events may negatively impact broad segments of businesses and populations and may exacerbate pre-existing risks to the Fund. The frequency and magnitude of resulting changes in the value of the Fund’s investments cannot be predicted. Certain securities and other investments held by the Fund may experience increased volatility, illiquidity, or other potentially adverse effects in reaction to changing market conditions. Monetary and/or fiscal actions taken by U.S. or foreign governments to stimulate or stabilize the global economy may not be effective and could lead to high market volatility. No active trading market may exist for certain investments held by the Fund, which may impair the ability of the Fund to sell or to realize the current valuation of such investments in the event of the need to liquidate such assets.

Municipal Obligations Risk. Because the Fund may invest in municipal obligations, the Fund may be susceptible to political, legislative, economic, regulatory, tax or other factors affecting issuers of these municipal obligations, such as state and local governments and their agencies. To the extent that the Fund invests in municipal obligations of issuers in the same state, U.S. territory, or economic sector, it could be more sensitive to economic, business or political developments that affect such state, territory, or sector. Municipal obligations and their issuers may be more susceptible to downgrade, loss of revenue, default and bankruptcy during periods of economic stress. The amount of public information available about municipal obligations is generally less than for corporate equities or bonds, meaning that the investment performance of municipal obligations may be more dependent on the analytical abilities of the investment adviser than stock or corporate bond investments. The secondary market for municipal obligations also tends to be less well-developed and less liquid than many other securities markets, which may limit the Fund’s ability to sell its municipal obligations at attractive prices. The differences between the price at which an obligation can be purchased and the price at which it can be sold may widen during periods of market distress. Less liquid obligations can become more difficult to value and be subject to erratic price movements.

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

The Fund's Investment Objectives, Principal Strategies and Principal Risks^‡ — continued

Insurance Risk. Municipal obligations may be insured as to their scheduled payment of principal and interest. Although the insurance feature may reduce some financial risks, the premiums for insurance and the higher market price sometimes paid for insured obligations may reduce the current yield on the insured obligation. Insured obligations also may be secured by bank credit agreements or escrow accounts. Changes in the ratings of an insurer may affect the value of an insured obligation, and in some cases may even cause the value of a security to be less than a comparable uninsured obligation. The insurance does not guarantee the market value of the insured obligation or the net asset value of the Fund’s shares. The credit rating of an insured obligation reflects the credit rating of the insurer, based on its claims-paying ability. The obligation of a municipal bond insurance company to pay a claim extends over the life of each insured obligation. Although defaults on insured municipal obligations have been low to date and municipal bond insurers have met their claims, there is no assurance this will continue. A higher than expected default rate could strain the insurer’s loss reserves and adversely affect its ability to pay claims to bondholders. Because a significant portion of insured municipal obligations that have been issued and are outstanding is insured by a small number of insurance companies, an event involving one or more of these insurance companies, such as a credit rating downgrade, could have a significant adverse effect on the value of the municipal obligations insured by that insurance company and on the municipal bond markets as a whole.

Risks of Municipal Lease Obligations (“MLOs”) and Certificates of Participation. MLOs and certificates of participation involve special risks not normally associated with general obligations or revenue bonds. MLOs are bonds that are secured by lease payments made by the party, typically a state or municipality, leasing the facilities (e.g., schools or office buildings) that were financed by the bond. Interest income from MLOs is generally exempt from local and state taxes in the state of issuance. MLOs, like other municipal debt obligations, are subject to the risk of non-payment. Although MLOs do not constitute general obligations of the issuer for which the issuer’s unlimited taxing power is pledged, the leasing state or municipality may be obligated to appropriate funds from its general tax revenues to make lease payments as long as it utilizes the leased property. Other lease payments may be subject to annual appropriation or may be made only from revenues associated with the facility financed. For example, certain lease obligations contain “non-appropriation” clauses, which provide that the issuer has no obligation to make lease or installment purchase payments in future years unless money is appropriated for such purpose on a yearly basis, which function to render constitutional and statutory requirements for the issuance of debt inapplicable to such obligations. In addition, such leases or contracts may be subject to temporary abatement of payments in the event the governmental issuer is prevented from maintaining occupancy of the leased premises or utilizing the leased equipment. Although “non-appropriation” lease obligations may be secured by the leased property, disposition of the property in the event of foreclosure might prove difficult, time consuming and costly, and may result in a delay in recovering or the failure to fully recover ownership of the assets.

A certificate of participation (also referred to as a “participation”) in a municipal lease is an instrument evidencing a pro rata share in a specific pledged revenue stream, usually lease payments by the issuer that are typically subject to annual appropriation. The certificate generally entitles the holder to receive a share, or participation, in the payments from a particular project. Certificates of participation involve the same risks as the underlying municipal leases. In addition, the Fund may be dependent upon the municipal authority issuing the certificate of participation to exercise remedies with respect to an underlying lease. Certificates of participation also entail a risk of default or bankruptcy, both of the issuer of the municipal lease and also the municipal agency issuing the certificate of participation.

MLOs and participations therein represent a type of financing that may not have the depth of marketability associated with more conventional securities and, as such, they may be less liquid than conventional securities. Certain MLOs may be deemed illiquid, unless determined by the investment adviser, pursuant to guidelines adopted by the Board, to be liquid securities. The investment adviser will consider the factors it believes are relevant to the marketability of the obligation, to the extent that information regarding such factor is available to the investment adviser and pertinent to the liquidity determination, which may include: (1) the willingness of dealers to bid for the obligation; (2) the number of dealers willing to purchase or sell the obligation and the number of other potential buyers; (3) the frequency of trades and quotes for the obligation; (4) the nature of the marketplace trades, including the time needed to dispose of the obligation, the method of soliciting offers, and the mechanics of transfer; (5) the willingness of the governmental issuer to continue to appropriate funds for the payment of the obligation; (6) how likely or remote an event of non-appropriation may be, which depends in varying degrees on a variety of factors, including those relating to the general creditworthiness of the governmental issuer, its dependence on its continuing access to the credit markets, and the importance to the issuer of the equipment, property or facility covered by the lease or contract; (7) an assessment of the likelihood that the lease may or may not be cancelled; and (8) other factors and information unique to the obligation in determining its liquidity.

The ability of issuers of MLOs to make timely lease payments may be adversely impacted in general economic downturns and as relative governmental cost burdens are allocated and reallocated among U.S. federal, state and local governmental units. Such non-payment would result in a reduction of income from and value of the obligation. Issuers of MLOs might seek protection under the bankruptcy laws. In the event of bankruptcy of such an issuer, holders of MLOs could experience delays and limitations with respect to the collection of principal and interest on such MLOs and may not, in all circumstances, be able to collect all principal and interest to which it is entitled. To enforce its rights in the event of a default in lease payments, the Fund might take possession of and manage the assets securing the issuer’s obligations on such securities or otherwise incur costs to protect its right, which may increase the Fund’s operating expenses and adversely affect the net asset value of the Fund. When the lease contains a non-appropriation clause, however, the failure to pay would not be a default and the Fund would not have the right to take possession of the assets. Any income derived from the Fund’s ownership or operation of such assets may not be tax-exempt.

Interest Rate Risk. In general, the value of debt instruments will fluctuate based on changes in interest rates. The value of these securities is likely to increase when interest rates fall and decline when interest rates rise. Duration measures the time-weighted expected cash flows of a fixed income security, while maturity refers to the amount of time until a fixed income security matures. Generally, securities with longer durations or maturities are more sensitive

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

The Fund's Investment Objectives, Principal Strategies and Principal Risks^‡ — continued

to changes in interest rates than securities with shorter durations or maturities, causing them to be more volatile. Conversely, fixed-income securities with shorter durations or maturities will be less volatile but may provide lower returns than fixed-income securities with longer durations or maturities. Because the Fund is managed toward an income objective, it may hold more longer-duration or maturity obligations and thereby be more exposed to interest rate risk than municipal income funds that are managed with a greater emphasis on total return. The impact of interest rate changes is significantly less for floating rate instruments that have relatively short periodic rate resets (e.g., ninety days or less). In a rising interest rate environment, the durations or maturities of income securities that have the ability to be prepaid or called by the issuer may be extended. In a declining interest rate environment, the proceeds from prepaid or maturing instruments may have to be reinvested at a lower interest rate.

Call and Reinvestment Risks. If interest rates fall, it is possible that issuers of callable bonds with high interest coupons will “call” (or prepay) their bonds before their maturity date. If a call were exercised by the issuer during a period of declining interest rates, the Fund would likely replace such called security with a lower yielding security. If that were to happen, it could decrease the Fund’s dividends and possibly could affect the market price of common shares. Similar risks exist when the Fund invests the proceeds from matured or traded municipal obligations at market interest rates that are below the Fund’s current earnings rate.

Credit Risk. Investments in municipal obligations and other debt obligations (referred to below as “debt instruments”) are subject to the risk of non-payment of scheduled principal and interest. Changes in economic conditions or other circumstances may reduce the capacity of the party obligated to make principal and interest payments on such instruments and may lead to defaults. Such non-payments and defaults may reduce the value of Fund shares and income distributions. The value of debt instruments also may decline because of concerns about the issuer’s ability to make principal and interest payments. In addition, the credit ratings of debt instruments may be lowered if the financial condition of the party obligated to make payments with respect to such instruments deteriorates. In order to enforce its rights in the event of a default, bankruptcy or similar situation, the Fund may be required to retain legal or similar counsel, which may increase the Fund’s operating expenses and adversely affect net asset value. Municipal obligations may be insured as to principal and interest payments. If the claims-paying ability or other rating of the insurer is downgraded by a rating agency, the value of such obligations may be negatively affected.

Lower Rated Investments Risk. Investments rated below investment grade and comparable unrated investments (sometimes referred to as “junk”) are speculative because of increased credit risk relative to other fixed income investments. Changes in economic conditions or other circumstances typically have a greater effect on the ability of issuers of lower rated investments to make principal and interest payments than they do on issuers of higher rated investments. An economic downturn generally leads to a higher non-payment rate, and a lower rated investment may lose significant value before a default occurs. Lower rated investments typically are subject to greater price volatility and illiquidity than higher rated investments.

Unrated Securities Risk. The Fund may invest in unrated obligations for which Eaton Vance will make a credit quality determination for purposes of the Fund’s credit quality policy. To the extent that the Fund invests in such unrated obligations, the Fund’s credit quality will be more dependent on Eaton Vance’s credit analysis than if the Fund invested in only rated obligations. Some unrated securities may not have an active trading market or may be difficult to value.

Leverage Risk. Certain Fund transactions may give rise to leverage. Leverage can result from a non-cash exposure to an asset, index, rate or underlying reference instrument. Leverage can also result from borrowings, issuance of preferred shares, or participation in residual interest bond transactions. Leverage can increase both the risk and return potential of the Fund. The use of leverage may cause the Fund to maintain liquid assets or liquidate portfolio positions when it may not be advantageous to do so to satisfy its obligations. Leverage may cause the Fund’s NAV to be more volatile than if it had not been leveraged, as certain types of leverage may exaggerate the effect of any increase or decrease in the value of the Fund’s portfolio securities. The loss on leveraged investments may substantially exceed the initial investment. The Fund intends to use leverage to provide the holders of common shares with a potentially higher return. To the extent the income from the securities purchased with funds received from leverage exceeds the cost of leverage, the Fund’s returns will be greater than if leverage had not been used. Conversely, if the income from the securities purchased with such funds is not sufficient to cover the cost of leverage, the return to the Fund will be less than if leverage had not been used, and therefore the amount available for distribution to the Fund’s common shareholders as dividends and other distributions will be reduced. In the latter case, the investment adviser in its best judgment may nevertheless determine to maintain the Fund’s leveraged position if it deems such action to be appropriate. The use of leverage through participation in residual bond transactions by the Fund creates an opportunity for increased net income, but, at the same time, creates special risks. The Fund may not be able to adjust its use of leverage rapidly enough to respond to interest rate volatility, inflation, and other changing market conditions. In particular, reducing and increasing leverage obtained through residual interest bonds is a time intensive process and it is not practicable to rapidly adjust such leverage in response to short-term fluctuations. As a result, the Fund’s use of leverage may have a negative impact on the Fund’s performance from time to time. There can be no assurance that a leveraging strategy will be successful during any period in which it is employed.

Risk of Residual Interest Bonds. The Fund may enter into residual interest bond transactions, which expose the Fund to leverage (as discussed above under “Leverage Risk”) and greater risk than an investment in a fixed-rate municipal bond, including the risk of loss of principal. The interest payments that the Fund receives on the residual interest bonds acquired in such transactions vary inversely with short-term interest rates, normally decreasing when short-term rates increase. As such, residual interest bonds tend to underperform the market for fixed rate bonds in rising long-term interest rate environments. The value and income of, and market for, residual interest bonds are volatile, and such bonds may have limited liquidity. As required by applicable accounting standards, the Fund records interest expense as a liability with respect to floating-rate notes and also records offsetting interest income in an amount equal to this expense.

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

The Fund's Investment Objectives, Principal Strategies and Principal Risks^‡ — continued

Restricted Securities Risk. Unless registered for sale to the public under applicable federal securities law, restricted securities can be sold only in private transactions to qualified purchasers pursuant to an exemption from registration. The sale price realized from a private transaction could be less than the Fund’s purchase price for the restricted security. It may be difficult to identify a qualified purchaser for a restricted security held by the Fund and such security could be deemed illiquid. It may also be more difficult to value such securities.

Derivatives Risk. The Fund’s exposure to derivatives involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other investments. The use of derivatives can lead to losses because of adverse movements in the price or value of the security, instrument, index, currency, commodity, economic indicator or event underlying a derivative (“reference instrument”), due to failure of a counterparty or due to tax or regulatory constraints. Derivatives may create leverage in the Fund, which represents a non-cash exposure to the underlying reference instrument. Leverage can increase both the risk and return potential of the Fund. Derivatives risk may be more significant when derivatives are used to enhance return or as a substitute for a cash investment position, rather than solely to hedge the risk of a position held by the Fund. Use of derivatives involves the exercise of specialized skill and judgment, and a transaction may be unsuccessful in whole or in part because of market behavior or unexpected events. Changes in the value of a derivative (including one used for hedging) may not correlate perfectly with the underlying reference instrument. Derivative instruments traded in over-the-counter markets may be difficult to value, may be illiquid, and may be subject to wide swings in valuation caused by changes in the value of the underlying reference instrument. If a derivative’s counterparty is unable to honor its commitments, the value of Fund shares may decline and the Fund could experience delays in (or be unable to achieve) the return of collateral or other assets held by the counterparty. The loss on derivative transactions may substantially exceed the initial investment. A derivative investment also involves the risks relating to the reference instrument underlying the investment.

Counterparty Risk. Changes in the credit quality of the companies that serve as the Fund’s counterparties with respect to its derivatives positions and liquidity providers for the Fund’s residual interest bonds or other investments supported by another party’s credit will affect the value of those instruments. Certain entities that have served as counterparties in the municipals markets have recently incurred significant financial hardships, including bankruptcy and material loss of credit standing as a result of exposure to investments that have experienced defaults or otherwise suffered extreme credit deterioration. As a result, such hardships have reduced these entities’ capital and called into question their continued ability to perform their obligations. By using derivatives or other instruments that expose the Fund to counterparties, the Fund assumes the risk that its counterparties could experience future financial hardship.

The counterparty risk for cleared derivatives is generally lower than for uncleared over-the-counter derivative transactions since generally a clearing organization becomes substituted for each counterparty to a cleared derivative contract and, in effect, guarantees the parties’ performance under the contract as each party to a trade looks only to the clearing organization for performance of financial obligations under the derivative contract. However, there can be no assurance that a clearing organization, or its members, will satisfy its obligations to the Fund.

Hedging Risk. The Fund’s use of derivatives or other transactions to reduce risks involves costs and will be subject to Eaton Vance’s ability to predict correctly changes in the relationships of such hedge instruments to the Fund’s portfolio holdings or other factors. No assurance can be given that Eaton Vance’s judgment in this respect will be correct. In addition, no assurance can be given that the Fund will enter into hedging or other transactions at times or under circumstances in which it may be advisable to do so. Hedging transactions have risks, including the imperfect correlation between the value of such instruments and the underlying assets of the Fund, which creates the possibility that the loss on such instruments may be greater than the gain, if any, in the value of the underlying asset in the Fund’s portfolio; the limited availability of such instruments; the loss of principal; the possible default of the other party to the transaction; illiquidity of the derivative investments; and the imperfect correlation between the tax-exempt and taxable markets. Furthermore, the ability to successfully use hedging transactions depends on the Eaton Vance’s ability to predict pertinent market movements, which cannot be assured. Thus, the use of hedging transactions may result in losses greater than if they had not been used, may require the Fund to sell or purchase portfolio investments at inopportune times or for prices other than current market values, may limit the amount of appreciation the Fund can realize on an investment, or may cause the Fund to hold a security that it might otherwise sell.

Swaps Risk. Swap agreements are two-party contracts entered into primarily by institutional investors for periods ranging from a few weeks to more than one year. In a standard “swap” transaction, two parties agree to exchange the returns (or differentials in rates of return) earned or realized on a particular predetermined reference instrument or instruments, which can be adjusted for an interest rate factor. The gross returns to be exchanged or “swapped” between the parties are generally calculated with respect to a “notional amount” (i.e., the return on or increase in value of a particular dollar amount invested at a particular interest rate or in a “basket” of securities representing a particular index). Other types of swap agreements may calculate the obligations of the parties to the agreement on a “net basis.” Consequently, a party’s current obligations (or rights) under a swap agreement will generally be equal only to the net amount to be paid or received under the agreement based on the relative values of the positions held by each party to the agreement (the “net amount”). Whether the use of swap agreements will be successful will depend on the investment adviser’s ability to predict correctly whether certain types of reference instruments are likely to produce greater returns than other instruments. Swap agreements may be subject to contractual restrictions on transferability and termination and they may have terms of greater than seven days. The Fund’s obligations under a swap agreement will be accrued daily (offset against any amounts owed to the Fund under the swap). Developments in the swaps market, including potential government regulation, could adversely affect the Fund’s ability to terminate existing swap agreements or to realize amounts to be received under such agreements, as well as to participate in swap agreements in the future. If there is a default by the counterparty to a swap, the Fund will have contractual remedies pursuant to the swap agreement, but any recovery may be delayed depending on the circumstances of the default.

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

The Fund's Investment Objectives, Principal Strategies and Principal Risks^‡ — continued

Private Activity Bonds. Private activity bonds, formerly referred to as industrial development bonds, are issued by or on behalf of public authorities to obtain funds to provide privately operated housing facilities, airport, mass transit or port facilities, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal or hazardous waste treatment or disposal facilities and certain local facilities for water supply, gas or electricity. Other types of private activity bonds, the proceeds of which are used for the construction, equipment, repair or improvement of privately operated industrial or commercial facilities, may constitute municipal obligations, although the current federal tax laws place substantial limitations on the size of such issues. Interest on certain “private activity bonds” issued after August 7, 1986 is exempt from regular federal income tax, but such interest (including a distribution by the Fund derived from such interest) is treated as a tax preference item which could subject the recipient to or increase the recipient’s liability for the AMT.

Futures Risk. Although some futures contracts call for making or taking delivery of the underlying reference instrument, generally these obligations are closed out prior to delivery by offsetting purchases or sales of matching futures contracts (same exchange, underlying security or index, and delivery month). Closing a futures contract sale is effected by purchasing a futures contract for the same aggregate amount of the specific type of financial instrument or commodity with the same delivery date. If an offsetting purchase price is less than the original sale price, the Fund realizes a capital gain, or if it is more, the Fund realizes a capital loss. Conversely, if an offsetting sale price is more than the original purchase price, the Fund realizes a capital gain, or if it is less, the Fund realizes a capital loss. The investment adviser has claimed an exclusion from the definition of a Commodity Pool Operator (“CPO”) under the Commodity Exchange Act with respect to the Fund and therefore, neither the investment adviser nor the Fund are subject to registration or regulation thereunder.

Structured Notes Risk. Structured notes are derivative debt instruments, the interest rate or principal of which is determined by an unrelated indicator (for example, a currency, security, commodity or index thereof). Indexed securities may include a multiplier that multiplies the indexed element by a specified factor and, therefore, the value of such securities may be very volatile. The terms of structured notes and indexed securities may provide that in certain circumstances no principal is due at maturity, which may result in a loss of invested capital. Structured notes and indexed securities may be positively or negatively indexed, so that appreciation of the unrelated indicator may produce an increase or a decrease in the interest rate or the value of the structured note or indexed security at maturity may be calculated as a specified multiple of the change in the value of the unrelated indicator. Structured notes and indexed securities may entail a greater degree of market risk than other types of investments because the investor bears the risk of the unrelated indicator. Structured notes or indexed securities also may be more volatile, less liquid, and more difficult to accurately price than less complex securities and instruments or more traditional debt securities.

Inflation Risk/Deflation Risk. Inflation risk is the risk that the value of assets or income from investment will be worth less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. As inflation increases, the real value of the common shares and distributions thereon can decline. In addition, during periods of rising inflation, short-term interest rates and the Fund’s cost of leverage would likely increase, reducing returns to the common shareholders to the extent that such increased cost is not offset by commensurately higher income. Deflation risk is the risk that prices throughout the economy decline over time − the opposite of inflation. Deflation may have an adverse affect on the creditworthiness of issuers and may make issuer defaults more likely, which may result in a decline in the value of the Fund’s investments.

Duration and Maturity Risk. Holding long duration and long maturity investments will expose the Fund to certain magnified risks. These risks include interest rate risk, credit risk and liquidity risks as discussed above.

Liquidity Risk. The Fund is exposed to liquidity risk when trading volume, lack of a market maker or trading partner, large position size, market conditions, or legal restrictions impair its ability to sell particular investments or to sell them at advantageous market prices. Consequently, the Fund may have to accept a lower price to sell an investment or continue to hold it or keep the position open, sell other investments to raise cash or abandon an investment opportunity, any of which could have a negative effect on the Fund’s performance. These effects may be exacerbated during times of financial or political stress.

Current Regulatory Environment Risk. From time to time proposals have been introduced before Congress for the purpose of restricting or eliminating the federal income tax exemption for interest on certain types of municipal obligations, and it can be expected that similar proposals may be introduced in the future. Any proposed or actual changes in such rates or exempt status, therefore, can significantly affect the demand for and supply, liquidity and marketability of municipal obligations. This could in turn affect the Fund’s net asset value and ability to acquire and dispose of municipal obligations at desirable yield and price levels.

Legislation may be enacted that could negatively affect the assets of the Fund. Legislation or regulation may change the way in which the Fund itself is regulated. The investment adviser cannot predict the effects of any new governmental regulation that may be implemented, and there can be no assurance that any new governmental regulation will not adversely affect the Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objective.

State Specific Risk. The Fund has no current intention to invest 25% or more of its gross assets in municipal obligations of issuers located in the same state (or U.S. territory) but reserves the flexibility to do so in the future. If the Fund focuses its investments in any one state (or U.S. territory), the Fund may be more susceptible to adverse economic, political or regulatory occurrences affecting a particular state (or territory). For example, certain municipal bond issuers in Puerto Rico have recently experienced financial difficulties, rating agency downgrades, and defaults.

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

The Fund's Investment Objectives, Principal Strategies and Principal Risks^‡ — continued

Focused Investment Risk. To the extent the Fund has substantial investments in a relatively small number of securities or issuers, or a particular market, industry, group of industries, country, region, group of countries, asset class or sector the Fund’s performance will be more susceptible to any single economic, market, political, or regulatory occurrence affecting those particular securities or issuers or that particular market, industry, group of industries, country, region, group of countries, assets class, or sector than a fund that invests more broadly.

Sector and Geographic Risk. Because the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in obligations issued in one or more states and/or U.S. territories and in certain types of municipal or other obligations and/or in certain sectors, the value of Fund shares may be affected by events that adversely affect a state, U.S. territory, sector or type of obligation and may fluctuate more than that of a fund that invests more broadly. General obligation bonds issued by municipalities can be adversely affected by economic downturns and any resulting decline in tax revenues.

Recent Market Conditions. Both U.S. and international markets have experienced significant volatility in recent months and years. As a result of such volatility, investment returns may fluctuate significantly. National economies are substantially interconnected, as are global financial markets, which creates the possibility that conditions in one country or region might adversely impact issuers in a different country or region. However, the interconnectedness of economies and/or markets may be diminishing, which may impact such economies and markets in ways that cannot be foreseen at this time.

The U.S. government and the U.S. Federal Reserve, as well as certain foreign governments and central banks, have from time to time taken steps to support financial markets. The U.S. government and the U.S. Federal Reserve may, conversely, reduce market support activities, including by taking action intended to increase certain interest rates. This and other government intervention may not work as intended, particularly if the efforts are perceived by investors as being unlikely to achieve the desired results. Changes in government activities in this regard, such as changes in interest rate policy, can negatively affect financial markets generally, increase market volatility and reduce the value and liquidity of securities in which the Fund invests.

Some countries, including the United States, have adopted more protectionist trade policies. Slowing global economic growth, the rise in protectionist trade policies, changes to some major international trade agreements, risks associated with the trade agreement between the United Kingdom and the European Union, and the risks associated with trade negotiations between the United States and China, could affect the economies of many nations in ways that cannot necessarily be foreseen at the present time. In addition, the current strength of the U.S. dollar may decrease foreign demand for U.S. assets, which could have a negative impact on certain issuers and/or industries.

Regulators in the United States have proposed and adopted a number of changes to regulations involving the markets and issuers, some of which apply to the Fund. The full effect of various newly adopted regulations is not currently known. Additionally, it is not currently known whether any of the proposed regulations will be adopted. However, due to the scope of regulations being proposed and adopted, certain of these changes to regulation could limit the Fund’s ability to pursue its investment strategies or make certain investments, may make it more costly for it to operate, or adversely impact performance.

Tensions, war, or open conflict between nations, such as between Russia and Ukraine, in the Middle East, or in eastern Asia could affect the economies of many nations, including the United States. The duration of ongoing hostilities and any sanctions and related events cannot be predicted. Those events present material uncertainty and risk with respect to markets globally and the performance of the Fund and its investments or operations could be negatively impacted.

There is widespread concern about the potential effects of global climate change on property and security values. Certain issuers, industries and regions may be adversely affected by the impact of climate change in ways that cannot be foreseen. The impact of legislation, regulation and international accords related to climate change may negatively impact certain issuers and/or industries.

Risks Associated with Active Management. The success of the Fund’s investment strategy depends on portfolio management’s successful application of analytical skills and investment judgment. Active management involves subjective decisions and there is no guarantee that such decisions will produce the desired results or expected returns.

Tax Risk. Income from tax-exempt municipal obligations could be declared taxable because of changes in tax laws, adverse interpretations by the relevant taxing authority or the non-compliant conduct of the issuer of an obligation.

Tax-Sensitive Investing Risk. The Fund may hold a security in order to achieve more favorable tax treatment or to sell a security in order to create tax losses. The Fund’s utilization of various tax-management techniques may be curtailed or eliminated by tax legislation, regulation or interpretations. The Fund may not be able to minimize taxable distributions to shareholders and a portion of the Fund’s distributions may be taxable.

Cybersecurity Risk. With the increased use of technologies by Fund service providers to conduct business, such as the Internet, the Fund is susceptible to operational, information security and related risks. In general, cyber incidents can result from deliberate attacks or unintentional events. Cybersecurity failures by or breaches of the Fund’s investment adviser or administrator and other service providers (including, but not limited to, the custodian or transfer agent), and the issuers of securities in which the Fund invests, may disrupt and otherwise adversely affect their business operations. This may result in financial losses to the Fund, impede Fund trading, interfere with the Fund’s ability to calculate its net asset value, interfere with the Fund’s ability to transact business or cause violations of applicable privacy and other laws, regulatory fines, penalties, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensation costs, or additional compliance costs.

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

The Fund's Investment Objectives, Principal Strategies and Principal Risks^‡ — continued

When-Issued and Delayed-Delivery Transactions Risk. Securities may be purchased on a “forward commitment,” “when-issued” or “delayed delivery” basis (meaning securities are purchased or sold with payment and delivery taking place in the future) in order to secure what is considered to be an advantageous price and yield at the time of entering into the transaction. When the Fund agrees to purchase such securities, it assumes the risk of any decline in value of the security from the date of the agreement to purchase. The Fund does not earn interest on the securities it has committed to purchase until they are paid for and delivered on the settlement date. From the time of entering into the transaction until delivery and payment is made at a later date, the securities that are the subject of the transaction are subject to market fluctuations. In forward commitment, when-issued or delayed delivery transactions, if the seller or buyer, as the case may be, fails to consummate the transaction the counterparty may miss the opportunity of obtaining a price or yield considered to be advantageous. However, no payment or delivery is made until payment is received or delivery is made from the other party to the transaction. Such transactions may be considered a form of leverage.

Other Investment Companies and ETF Risk. The Fund may, subject to the limitations of the 1940 Act, invest in the securities of other investment companies. Such securities may be leveraged. As a result, the Fund may be indirectly exposed to leverage through an investment in such securities. Utilization of leverage is a speculative investment technique and involves certain risks. The Fund, as a holder of the securities of other investment companies, will bear its pro rata portion of the other investment companies’ expenses, including advisory fees. These expenses are in addition to the direct expenses of the Fund’s own operations.

The Fund may invest in the securities of ETFs, to the extent permitted by law. ETFs are often designed to provide investment results that generally correspond to the price and yield performance of the component securities (or commodities) of the benchmark index. ETFs are listed on an exchange and trade in the secondary market on a per-share basis. The values of ETFs are subject to change as the values of their respective component securities (or commodities) fluctuate according to market volatility. Pooled investment vehicles, including ETFs, are subject to the risks of investing in the underlying securities or other instruments that they own. The market for common shares of ETFs, which are generally traded on an exchange and may be traded at a premium or discount to net asset value, is affected by the demand for those securities, regardless of the value of such ETF’s underlying securities. Additionally, natural or environmental disasters, widespread disease or other public health issues, war, acts of terrorism or other events could result in increased premiums or discounts to an ETF’s net asset value. Investments in ETFs may not exactly match the performance of a direct investment in the respective indices to which they are intended to correspond due to the temporary unavailability of certain index securities in the secondary market or other extraordinary circumstances, such as discrepancies with respect to the weighting of securities. Typically, the ETF bears its own operational expenses, which are deducted from its assets. To the extent that the Fund invests in ETFs, the Fund must bear these expenses in addition to the expenses of its own operation.

Geopolitical Risk. The increasing interconnectivity between global economies and financial markets increases the likelihood that events or conditions in one region or financial market may adversely impact issuers in a different country, region or financial market. Securities in the Fund’s portfolio may underperform due to inflation (or expectations for inflation), interest rates, global demand for particular products or resources, natural disasters, health emergencies (such as epidemics and pandemics), terrorism, regulatory events and governmental or quasi-governmental actions. The occurrence of global events similar to those in recent years, such as terrorist attacks around the world, natural disasters, health emergencies, social and political discord, war or debt crises and downgrades, among others, may result in market volatility and may have short and/or long term effects on both the U.S. and global financial markets. Other financial, economic and other global market and social developments or disruptions may result in similar adverse circumstances, and it is difficult to predict when similar events affecting the U.S. or global financial markets may occur, the effects that such events may have and the duration of those effects (which may last for extended periods). Such global events may negatively impact broad segments of businesses and populations, cause a significant negative impact on the performance of the Fund’s investments, adversely affect and increase the volatility of the Fund’s share price and/or exacerbate preexisting political, social and economic risks to the Fund. The Fund’s operations may be interrupted and any such event(s) could have a significant adverse impact on the value and risk profile of the Fund’s portfolio. There is a risk that you may lose money by investing in the Fund.

Market Disruption. Global instability, war, geopolitical tensions and terrorist attacks in the United States and around the world have previously resulted, and may in the future result in market volatility and may have long-term effects on the United States and worldwide financial markets and may cause further economic uncertainties in the United States and worldwide. The Fund cannot predict the effects of significant future events on the global economy and securities markets. A similar disruption of the financial markets could impact interest rates, auctions, secondary trading, ratings, credit risk, inflation and other factors relating to the common shares.

Anti-Takeover Provisions. The Fund’s Agreement and Declaration of Trust and Amended and Restated By-Laws include provisions that could have the effect of making it more difficult to acquire control of the Fund or to change the composition of its Board.

General Fund Investing Risks. The Fund is not a complete investment program and there is no guarantee that the Fund will achieve its investment objective. It is possible to lose money by investing in the Fund. An investment in the Fund is not a deposit in a bank and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency.

There have been no material changes to the Fund’s investment objective or principal investment strategies since November 30, 2024.

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Summary of Fund Expenses

The purpose of the table below is to help you understand all fees and expenses that you, as a common shareholder, would bear directly or indirectly. The table reflects leverage attributable to floating-rate notes for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2025 in an amount equal to 31.0% of the Trust’s average gross assets (including floating-rate notes) and shows Trust expenses as a percentage of net assets attributable to common shares.

Common shareholder transaction expenses
Sales load paid by you (as a percentage of offering price)	— ¹
Offering expenses (as a percentage of offering price)	None ²
Dividend reinvestment plan fees	$5.00³

Annual expenses	Percentage of net assets attributable to common shares⁴
Management fee	0.87%⁵
Interest expense	1.45%⁶
Other expenses	0.14%
Total annual Fund operating expenses	2.46%

Example

The following Example illustrates the expenses that common shareholders would pay on a $1,000 investment in common shares, assuming (i) total annual expenses of 2.46% of net assets attributable to common shares in years 1 through 10; (ii) a 5% annual return; and (iii) all distributions are reinvested at NAV:

1 Year	3 Years	5 Years	10 Years
$25	$77	$131	$280

The above table and example and the assumption in the example of a 5% annual return are required by regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that are applicable to all investment companies; the assumed 5% annual return is not a prediction of, and does not represent, the projected or actual performance of the Trust’s common shares. In addition, while the example assumes reinvestment of all dividends and distributions NAV, participants in the Trust’s dividend reinvestment plan may receive common shares purchased or issued at a price or value different from NAV. The example does not include sales load or estimated offering costs, which would cause the expenses shown in the example to increase.

The example should not be considered a representation of past or future expenses, and the Trust’s actual expenses may be greater or less than those shown. Moreover, the Trust’s actual rate of return may be greater or less than the hypothetical 5% return shown in the example.

¹ If common shares are sold to or through underwriters, the Prospectus Supplement will set forth any applicable sales load.

² Eaton Vance Management (“EVM”) will pay the expenses of the offering (other than the applicable commissions); therefore, offering expenses are not included in the Summary of Fund Expenses. Offering expenses generally include, but are not limited to, the preparation, review and filing with the SEC of the Trust’s registration statement (including its current Prospectus Supplement, the accompanying Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”)), the preparation, review and filing of any associated marketing or similar materials, costs associated with the printing, mailing or other distribution of its current Prospectus Supplement, the accompanying Prospectus, SAI and/or marketing materials, associated filing fees, stock exchange listing fees, and legal and auditing fees associated with the offering.

³ You will be charged a $5.00 service charge and pay brokerage charges if you direct the plan agent to sell your common shares held in a dividend reinvestment account.

⁴ Stated as a percentage of average net assets attributable to common shares for the year ended November 30, 2025.

⁵ The management fee paid by the Trust to EVM is based on the average daily gross assets of the Trust, including the principal amount of any indebtedness for money borrowed, the amount of any outstanding preferred shares issued by the Trust and, to a limited extent, the amount of floating-rate notes included as a liability in the Trust's Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Accordingly, if the Trust were to increase investment leverage in the future, the management fee will increase as a percentage of net assets.

⁶ Interest expense relates to the Trust’s liability with respect to floating-rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with investments in residual interest bonds. The Trust records offsetting interest income in an amount at least equal to this expense relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Trading and NAV Information

The Trust’s common shares have traded both at a premium and a discount to NAV. The Trust cannot predict whether its shares will trade in the future at a premium or discount to NAV. The provisions of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), generally require that the public offering price of common shares (less any underwriting commissions and discounts) must equal or exceed the NAV per share of a company’s common stock. The issuance of common shares may have an adverse effect on prices in the secondary market for the Trust’s common shares by increasing the number of common shares available, which may put downward pressure on the market price for the Trust’s common shares. Shares of common stock of closed-end investment companies frequently trade at a discount from NAV.

In addition, the Trust’s Board of Trustees has authorized the Trust to repurchase up to 10% of its common shares outstanding as of the last day of the prior calendar year at market prices when shares are trading at a discount to net asset value. The share repurchase program does not obligate the Trust to purchase a specific amount of shares. The results of the share repurchase program are disclosed in the Trust’s annual and semi-annual reports to shareholders.

The following table sets forth for each of the periods indicated the high and low closing market prices for the common shares on the New York Stock Exchange, and the corresponding NAV per share and the premium or discount to NAV per share at which the Trust’s common shares were trading as of such date.

	Market Price ($)		NAV per Share on Date of Market Price ($)		NAV Premium/(Discount) on Date of Market Price (%)
Fiscal Quarter Ended	High	Low	High	Low	High	Low
November 30, 2025	11.23	10.40	10.73	10.35	4.66	0.48
August 31, 2025	10.64	10.21	10.41	10.44	2.21	(2.20)
May 31, 2025	10.73	9.82	11.22	10.58	(4.37)	(7.18)
February 28, 2025	10.78	9.91	11.25	10.93	(4.18)	(9.33)
November 30, 2024	11.24	10.35	11.53	11.12	(2.52)	(6.92)
August 31, 2024	10.85	9.98	11.45	11.13	(5.24)	(10.33)
May 31, 2024	10.35	9.81	11.46	11.11	(9.69)	(11.70)
February 29, 2024	10.28	9.53	11.41	11.14	(9.90)	(14.45)

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Endnotes and Additional Disclosures

†	The views expressed in this report are those of the portfolio manager(s) and are current only through the date stated at the top of this page. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and Eaton Vance and the Fund(s) disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions are based on many factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. This commentary may contain statements that are not historical facts, referred to as “forward-looking statements.” The Fund’s actual future results may differ significantly from those stated in any forward-looking statement, depending on factors such as changes in securities or financial markets or general economic conditions, the volume of sales and purchases of Fund shares, the continuation of investment advisory, administrative and service contracts, and other risks discussed from time to time in the Fund’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
^‡	The information contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell Fund shares. Common shares of the Fund are available for purchase and sale only at current market prices in secondary market trading.

¹	Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index of municipal bonds traded in the U.S. Unless otherwise stated, index returns do not reflect the effect of any applicable sales charges, commissions, expenses, taxes or leverage, as applicable. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
²	Performance results reflect the effects of leverage. Included in the average annual total return at NAV for the ten year period is the impact of the 2016 tender and repurchase of a portion of the Fund’s Auction Preferred Shares (APS) at 94.5% of the Fund’s APS per share liquidation preference. Had this transaction not occurred, the total return at NAV would be lower for the Fund.
³	The shares of the Fund often trade at a discount or premium to their net asset value. The discount or premium may vary over time and may be higher or lower than what is quoted in this report. For up-to-date premium/discount information, please refer to https://funds.eatonvance.com/closed-end-fund-prices.php.
⁴	The Distribution Rate is calculated by dividing the Fund’s last regular distribution paid per share in the period (annualized) by the Fund’s NAV or market price (the price at which the Fund is traded on the exchange) at the end of the period. A Fund’s distributions in any period may be more or less than the net return earned by the Fund on its investments and should not be used as a measure of performance or confused with “yield” or “income.” The Fund has adopted a policy to pay common shareholders a stable monthly distribution. A portion of the Fund’s distributions may be subject to the U.S. federal alternative minimum tax. In an effort to maintain a stable distribution amount, the Fund may pay distributions consisting of amounts characterized for U.S. federal income tax purposes as exempt-interest dividends, ordinary dividends (including qualified dividends), capital gain distributions and nondividend distributions, also known as return of capital distributions. A nondividend or return of capital distribution results from a Fund

distributing more than its net investment income and net realized capital gain for a given tax period and may represent a return of some or all of the money that an investor invested in the Fund’s shares, which, like other distributions, can cause the Fund’s NAV to erode. There is no assurance that the Fund will always be able to pay distributions of a particular size.

With each distribution, the Fund issues a notice to shareholders and a press release containing information about the amount and sources of the distribution and related information. Notices and press releases for the last 24 months are available on our website https://www. eatonvance.com/resources/closed-end-fund-distribution-notices-19a.html. The amounts and sources of distributions are only estimates and are not provided for tax reporting purposes. The U.S. federal income tax character of distributions paid to a shareholder is reported on IRS Form 1099-DIV, which is provided to shareholders shortly after the end of each calendar year.

The amount of the Fund’s distributions is determined by the investment adviser based on its current assessment of the Fund’s long-term return potential. Fund distributions may be affected by numerous factors including changes in Fund performance, the cost of financing for Funds that employ leverage, portfolio holdings, realized and projected returns, and other factors. As portfolio and market conditions change, the rate of distributions paid by the Fund could change. Shareholders should not assume that the source of any distribution from the Fund is net income or profit.

Taxable-equivalent distributions are calculated using a 40.8% U.S. federal income tax rate, which reflects the maximum U.S. federal tax rate of 37% plus the 3.8% U.S. federal Medicare surtax. Where applicable, the calculation also includes the highest individual U.S. state income tax rate for residents of the state for which a Fund’s income is designed to be exempt. Local income taxes and other applicable taxes are not considered in the calculation.

⁵

Fund employs RIB financing. The leverage created by RIB investments provides an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater price volatility). The cost of leverage rises and falls with changes in short-term interest rates. See “Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities Held” in the notes to the financial statements for more information about RIB financing. RIB leverage represents the amount of Floating Rate Notes outstanding at period end as a percentage of Fund net assets plus Floating Rate Notes.

	Fund profile subject to change due to active management.
	Additional Information
	Bloomberg High Yield Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index of non-investment grade municipal bonds traded in the U.S.
	Yield curve is a graphical representation of the yields offered by bonds of various maturities. The yield curve flattens when long-term interest rates fall and/or short-term interest rates increase, and the yield curve steepens when long-term interest rates increase and/or short-term interest rates fall.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Portfolio of Investments

Corporate Bonds — 1.0%

Security	Principal Amount (000's omitted)		Value
Hospital — 0.1%
Boston Medical Center Corp., 4.581%, 7/1/47	$	835	$ 666,185
			$ 666,185
Other — 0.9%
Morongo Band of Mission Indians, 7.00%, 10/1/39⁽¹⁾	$	3,470	$ 3,788,969
			$ 3,788,969
Total Corporate Bonds (identified cost $4,305,000)			$ 4,455,154

Tax-Exempt Municipal Obligations — 139.7%

Security	Principal Amount (000's omitted)		Value
Bond Bank — 0.3%
Delaware Valley Regional Finance Authority, PA, 5.75%, 7/1/32	$	1,000	$ 1,162,952
Rickenbacker Port Authority, OH, (OASBO Expanded Asset Pooled Financing Program), 5.375%, 1/1/32		280	311,134
			$ 1,474,086
Cogeneration — 0.1%
Northampton County Industrial Development Authority, PA, (Northampton Generating), (AMT), 5.00%, 6/30/27⁽²⁾	$	630	$ 277,291
			$ 277,291
Education — 5.9%
Arizona Industrial Development Authority, (Pinecrest Academy of Nevada), 4.00%, 7/15/50⁽¹⁾	$	430	$ 345,675
Boyle County, KY, (Centre College), 4.50%, 6/1/53		1,000	907,126
California Municipal Finance Authority, (Westside Neighborhood School), 6.20%, 6/15/54⁽¹⁾		1,060	1,113,625
California State University, 5.25%, 11/1/56⁽³⁾		4,000	4,358,240
Capital Trust Agency, FL, (Florida Charter Educational Foundation, Inc.):
5.375%, 6/15/38⁽¹⁾		350	347,765
5.375%, 6/15/48⁽¹⁾		655	604,844
District of Columbia, (KIPP DC), 4.00%, 7/1/44		485	433,955
Florida Higher Educational Facilities Financing Authority, (Jacksonville University), 5.00%, 6/1/48⁽¹⁾		250	218,857
Illinois Finance Authority, (DePaul College Prep Foundation), 5.625%, 8/1/53⁽¹⁾		1,000	1,024,243

Security	Principal Amount (000's omitted)		Value
Education (continued)
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Boston University), 6.00%, 5/15/59	$	5,580	$ 6,120,557
Pennsylvania University, 5.50%, 9/1/55⁽³⁾		6,000	6,578,460
Public Finance Authority, WI, (Roseman University of Health Sciences):
4.00%, 4/1/52⁽¹⁾		245	194,388
5.00%, 4/1/40⁽¹⁾		710	712,477
5.00%, 4/1/50⁽¹⁾		1,030	957,759
South Carolina Jobs-Economic Development Authority, (Carolina Voyager), 5.00%, 6/15/44⁽¹⁾		1,745	1,749,139
			$ 25,667,110
Electric Utilities — 2.5%
Omaha Public Power District, NE, 5.25%, 2/1/55⁽³⁾	$	10,000	$ 10,697,800
Seattle, WA, Municipal Light and Power Revenue, 5.00%, 3/1/53		30	31,139
			$ 10,728,939
Escrowed/Prerefunded — 0.0%^†
Public Finance Authority, WI, (Roseman University of Health Sciences):
Prerefunded to 4/1/30, 5.00%, 4/1/50⁽¹⁾	$	20	$ 21,810
Prerefunded to 4/1/32, 4.00%, 4/1/52⁽¹⁾		5	5,344
			$ 27,154
General Obligations — 21.9%
Aledo Independent School District, TX, (PSF Guaranteed), 5.00%, 2/15/53⁽³⁾	$	4,000	$ 4,137,320
Bend, OR, 5.00%, 6/1/50⁽³⁾		10,000	10,686,700
California:
5.00%, 3/1/49⁽³⁾		10,000	10,761,600
5.25%, 9/1/53⁽³⁾		6,000	6,466,620
Canton Independent School District, TX, (PSF Guaranteed):
5.25%, 2/15/50⁽³⁾		2,350	2,531,185
5.25%, 2/15/55⁽³⁾		2,350	2,510,857
Chicago Board of Education, IL:
5.00%, 12/1/42		8,160	7,649,127
6.00%, 12/1/49		2,625	2,645,552
Chicago, IL, 5.75%, 1/1/33		1,500	1,527,363
Hays Consolidated Independent School District, TX, (PSF Guaranteed), 5.25%, 2/15/55⁽³⁾		10,000	10,637,600
Illinois:
5.00%, 12/1/42		3,020	3,056,818
5.50%, 5/1/39		290	309,925
5.75%, 5/1/45		295	310,928

See Notes to Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Portfolio of Investments — continued

Security	Principal Amount (000's omitted)		Value
General Obligations (continued)
Massachusetts, 5.00%, 4/1/55⁽³⁾	$	4,000	$ 4,203,960
Mesquite Independent School District, TX, (PSF Guaranteed):
5.00%, 8/15/49		260	274,393
5.00%, 8/15/49⁽³⁾		6,000	6,332,100
Northside Independent School District, TX, (PSF Guaranteed), 5.25%, 2/15/55⁽³⁾		6,750	7,222,567
Puerto Rico, 0.00%, 7/1/33		3,000	2,162,915
Royse City Independent School District, TX, (PSF Guaranteed):
5.00%, 2/15/53		5	5,195
5.25%, 2/15/55⁽³⁾		1,325	1,416,730
5.25%, 2/15/58⁽³⁾		2,275	2,432,498
San Angelo Independent School District, TX, (PSF Guaranteed), 5.25%, 2/15/55⁽³⁾		4,000	4,283,200
Van Alstyne Independent School District, TX, (PSF Guaranteed), 5.25%, 2/15/55⁽³⁾		3,300	3,533,640
			$ 95,098,793
Hospital — 6.8%
Allen County, OH, (Mercy Health), 4.00%, 8/1/47⁽³⁾	$	1,000	$ 925,160
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, (CommonSpirit Health Obligations), 5.50%, 11/1/47		1,485	1,571,357
Idaho Health Facilities Authority, ID, (St. Luke’s Health System), 4.375%, 3/1/53		2,000	1,917,862
Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (MedStar Health), 5.00%, 8/15/42		3,885	3,886,356
Michigan Finance Authority, (McLaren Health Care), 4.00%, 2/15/47		2,985	2,704,540
Montgomery County Higher Education and Health Authority, PA, (Thomas Jefferson University Obligated Group), 5.00%, 5/1/57		1,365	1,374,681
Muskingum County, OH, (Genesis HealthCare System Obligated Group), 5.00%, 2/15/44		1,835	1,824,738
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (AHS Hospital Corp.), 5.00%, 7/1/27		35	35,033
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (UPMC), 4.00%, 5/15/48		750	669,783
South Carolina Jobs-Economic Development Authority, (McLeod Health), 5.25%, 11/1/54⁽³⁾		6,500	6,913,855
South Carolina Jobs-Economic Development Authority, (Novant Health Obligated Group), 4.25%, 11/1/47		2,000	1,927,096
Southeastern Ohio Port Authority, OH, (Memorial Health System Obligated Group):
5.00%, 12/1/43		875	768,587
5.50%, 12/1/43		750	708,714

Security	Principal Amount (000's omitted)		Value
Hospital (continued)
West Virginia Hospital Finance Authority, (West Virginia University Health System Obligated Group), 4.375%, 6/1/53	$	4,055	$ 3,790,957
Westchester County Local Development Corp., NY, (Westchester Medical Center Obligated Group), 6.25%, 11/1/52		340	343,796
			$ 29,362,515
Housing — 2.5%
Indiana Housing and Community Development Authority, SFMR, Social Bonds, (FHLMC), (FNMA), (GNMA), 4.70%, 7/1/53	$	1,475	$ 1,472,902
Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, Sustainability Bonds, 4.90%, 12/1/59		1,000	1,001,915
Michigan Housing Development Authority, Social Bonds, 5.00%, 12/1/55		1,385	1,399,628
Texas Student Housing Corp., (University of North Texas), 6.85%, 7/1/31⁽⁴⁾		180	180,000
Washington Housing Finance Commission, Social Certificates, 3.375%, 4/20/37		5,006	4,737,585
Waterbury Housing Authority, CT, (Laurel Estates Preservation LLC), (FHLMC), 4.50%, 2/1/42		1,995	2,071,748
			$ 10,863,778
Industrial Development Revenue — 10.3%
Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (United States Steel Corp.):
Green Bonds, (AMT), 5.45%, 9/1/52	$	3,000	$ 3,012,565
Green Bonds, (AMT), 5.70%, 5/1/53		3,385	3,453,710
Cleveland, OH, (Continental Airlines), 5.375%, 9/15/27		555	555,770
Hawaii Department of Budget and Finance, (Hawaiian Electric Co.), 3.20%, 7/1/39		1,000	893,163
Henderson, KY, (Pratt Paper, LLC), (AMT), 4.70%, 1/1/52⁽¹⁾		2,500	2,384,218
Hoover Industrial Development Board, AL, (United States Steel Corp.), (AMT), 5.75%, 10/1/49		1,250	1,267,379
Jefferson County Port Authority, OH, (JSW Steel USA Ohio, Inc.):
5.00% to 12/1/28 (Put Date), 12/1/53⁽¹⁾		3,500	3,587,506
(AMT), 3.50%, 12/1/51⁽¹⁾		2,000	1,660,552
National Finance Authority, NH, (Covanta):
4.625%, 11/1/42⁽¹⁾		3,075	2,749,275
(AMT), 4.875%, 11/1/42⁽¹⁾		245	223,189
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Continental Airlines):
5.25%, 9/15/29		3,400	3,404,438
5.50%, 6/1/33		750	751,632
(AMT), 5.625%, 11/15/30		4,510	4,517,821

See Notes to Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Portfolio of Investments — continued

Security	Principal Amount (000's omitted)		Value
Industrial Development Revenue (continued)
New York State Environmental Facilities Corp., (Casella Waste Systems, Inc.), (AMT), 5.125% to 9/3/30 (Put Date), 9/1/50⁽¹⁾	$	700	$ 730,382
New York Transportation Development Corp., (Delta Air Lines, Inc. - LaGuardia Airport Terminals C&D Redevelopment):
(AMT), 5.00%, 10/1/40		6,845	6,947,179
(AMT), 5.625%, 4/1/40		5,605	5,890,179
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Procter & Gamble Paper Products Co.), 5.375%, 3/1/31		1,000	1,114,063
Valparaiso, IN, (Pratt Paper (IN), LLC), (AMT), 5.00%, 1/1/54⁽¹⁾		1,000	994,011
Vermont Economic Development Authority, (Casella Waste Systems, Inc.), (AMT), 4.625% to 4/3/28 (Put Date), 4/1/36⁽¹⁾		300	303,585
			$ 44,440,617
Insured - Education — 0.6%
Massachusetts College Building Authority, (AG), 5.50%, 5/1/39	$	1,000	$ 1,201,799
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Holy Cross College), (AMBAC), 5.25%, 9/1/32⁽³⁾		1,365	1,572,562
			$ 2,774,361
Insured - Electric Utilities — 3.6%
Cleveland, OH, Public Power System Revenue:
(NPFG), 0.00%, 11/15/27	$	710	$ 665,999
(NPFG), 0.00%, 11/15/38		2,000	1,131,717
Georgia Municipal Electric Authority, (Plant Vogtle Units 3 & 4 Project J), (AG), 5.00%, 7/1/64		3,125	3,175,307
Ohio Municipal Electric Generation Agency, (NPFG), 0.00%, 2/15/26		3,000	2,980,338
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority:
(NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/29		1,515	1,527,426
(NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/32		250	253,333
(NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/34		1,445	1,460,713
South Carolina Public Service Authority, (AG), 5.75%, 12/1/52		4,000	4,330,012
			$ 15,524,845
Insured - General Obligations — 1.1%
Canal Winchester Local School District, OH, (NPFG), 0.00%, 12/1/30	$	2,455	$ 2,105,963
Detroit School District, MI, (AG), 5.25%, 5/1/32		300	338,005

Security	Principal Amount (000's omitted)		Value
Insured - General Obligations (continued)
Massachusetts, (AMBAC), 5.50%, 8/1/30	$	1,000	$ 1,118,026
Whatcom County Public Utility District No. 1, WA, (BAM), (AMT), 5.50%, 12/1/42		1,000	1,082,298
			$ 4,644,292
Insured - Hospital — 1.0%
West Virginia Hospital Finance Authority, (Vandalia Health), (AG), 5.50%, 9/1/48	$	3,000	$ 3,228,698
Westchester County Local Development Corp., NY, (Westchester Medical Center Obligated Group), (AG), 5.00%, 11/1/51		1,140	1,168,466
			$ 4,397,164
Insured - Housing — 0.3%
Knox County Health, Educational and Housing Facility Board, TN, (University of Tennessee), (BAM), 5.25%, 7/1/64	$	1,300	$ 1,339,329
			$ 1,339,329
Insured - Lease Revenue/Certificates of Participation — 1.4%
Hinds County, MS, (Mississippi Lease Purchase), (BAM), 4.625%, 9/1/54⁽¹⁾	$	2,800	$ 2,620,676
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (School Facilities Construction), (NPFG), 5.50%, 9/1/28		1,000	1,076,936
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, (Transportation System), (AMBAC), 0.00%, 12/15/28		2,400	2,190,810
			$ 5,888,422
Insured - Other Revenue — 0.3%
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (WGBH Educational Foundation), (AMBAC), 5.75%, 1/1/42	$	590	$ 691,338
New York City Industrial Development Agency, NY, (Queens Baseball Stadium), (AG), 3.00%, 1/1/46		560	431,404
			$ 1,122,742
Insured - Special Tax Revenue — 4.3%
Harris County-Houston Sports Authority, TX, (AG), (NPFG), 0.00%, 11/15/34	$	4,210	$ 2,768,123
Massachusetts, Dedicated Tax Revenue, (NPFG), 5.50%, 1/1/29		1,000	1,085,884
Miami-Dade County, FL, Professional Sports Franchise Facilities, (AG), 0.00%, 10/1/37		20,700	12,265,094
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Motor Vehicle Surcharges):
(AG), 0.00%, 7/1/26		760	745,673

See Notes to Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Portfolio of Investments — continued

Security	Principal Amount (000's omitted)		Value
Insured - Special Tax Revenue (continued)
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Motor Vehicle Surcharges): (continued)
(AG), 0.00%, 7/1/27	$	2,020	$ 1,917,764
			$ 18,782,538
Insured - Transportation — 8.0%
Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, CA, (NPFG), 0.00%, 10/1/33	$	12,425	$ 9,659,091
Allegheny County Airport Authority, PA, (Pittsburgh International Airport), (AG), (AMT), 5.50%, 1/1/53		2,375	2,484,049
Chicago, IL, (Midway International Airport), (BAM), (AMT), 5.50%, 1/1/53		6,000	6,293,891
Houston, TX, Airport System Revenue, (AG), (AMT), 4.50%, 7/1/53		6,500	6,271,852
New York Transportation Development Corp., (John F. Kennedy Airport Terminal 6 Redevelopment), Green Bonds, (AG), (AMT), 5.25%, 12/31/54		3,985	4,054,170
Ohio Turnpike Commission, (NPFG), 5.50%, 2/15/26		515	517,870
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (PennDOT Major Bridges Package One), (AG), (AMT), 5.00%, 12/31/57		2,000	2,035,801
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, (AG), 6.375%, 12/1/38		2,500	2,650,765
Philadelphia Parking Authority, PA, (AMBAC), 5.25%, 2/15/29		820	821,669
			$ 34,789,158
Insured - Water and Sewer — 4.2%
DeKalb County, GA, Water and Sewerage Revenue, (AG), 5.00%, 10/1/35⁽³⁾	$	17,985	$ 18,248,300
			$ 18,248,300
Lease Revenue/Certificates of Participation — 4.5%
Baltimore, MD, (Harbor Point), 4.875%, 6/1/42	$	555	$ 563,252
New Hampshire Business Finance Authority, (Centurion BioSquare, Inc.), 5.88%, 12/15/38		4,115	4,246,111
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Portal North Bridge Project), 5.00%, 11/1/52		3,500	3,605,461
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (School Facilities Construction), 5.00%, 6/15/48		8,000	8,130,613
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, (Transportation Program), 5.25%, 6/15/43		2,730	2,820,351
			$ 19,365,788
Other Revenue — 2.2%
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, OH, 5.00%, 6/1/55	$	5,045	$ 4,255,598

Security	Principal Amount (000's omitted)		Value
Other Revenue (continued)
Central Falls Detention Facility Corp., RI, 7.25%, 7/15/35⁽⁴⁾	$	1,925	$ 750,750
Kalispel Tribe of Indians, WA, Series A, 5.25%, 1/1/38⁽¹⁾		485	494,609
Military Installation Development Authority, UT, 4.00%, 6/1/41		500	463,971
Morongo Band of Mission Indians, CA, 5.00%, 10/1/42⁽¹⁾		890	901,692
Patriots Energy Group Financing Agency, SC, Gas Supply Revenue, 5.25% to 8/1/31 (Put Date), 10/1/54		2,000	2,180,719
Riversouth Authority, OH, (Lazarus Building Redevelopment), 5.75%, 12/1/27		310	310,080
Southeast Energy Authority, AL, 5.00% to 6/1/35 (Put Date), 1/1/56		225	235,155
			$ 9,592,574
Senior Living/Life Care — 11.0%
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Episcopal Communities and Services), 5.25%, 11/15/58	$	1,530	$ 1,558,916
Clackamas County Hospital Facility Authority, OR, (Rose Villa), 5.25%, 11/15/50		215	208,652
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, (Aberdeen Ridge), 5.00%, 5/15/58		1,510	1,086,453
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, (Frasier), 5.25%, 5/15/48		435	440,923
District of Columbia, (Ingleside at Rock Creek), 5.00%, 7/1/52		1,000	928,539
Franklin County, OH, (Friendship Village of Dublin), 5.00%, 11/15/44		520	503,119
Lancaster County Hospital Authority, PA, (Brethren Village), 5.00%, 7/1/32		725	730,243
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Linden Ponds, Inc.):
5.00%, 11/15/33⁽¹⁾		775	798,951
5.00%, 11/15/38⁽¹⁾		545	561,738
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (NewBridge on the Charles, Inc.), 5.00%, 10/1/57⁽¹⁾		310	299,950
Montgomery County Industrial Development Authority, PA, (Whitemarsh Continuing Care Retirement Community), 5.00%, 1/1/38		3,715	3,718,548
Multnomah County Hospital Facilities Authority, OR, (Terwilliger Plaza), 4.00%, 12/1/51		2,700	2,090,829
National Finance Authority, NH, (The Vista):
5.625%, 7/1/46⁽¹⁾		465	466,110
5.75%, 7/1/54⁽¹⁾		1,270	1,270,984

See Notes to Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Portfolio of Investments — continued

Security	Principal Amount (000's omitted)		Value
Senior Living/Life Care (continued)
New Mexico Hospital Equipment Loan Council, (Haverland Carter Lifestyle Group):
5.00%, 7/1/33	$	120	$ 120,475
5.00%, 7/1/34		130	130,177
5.00%, 7/1/49		2,775	2,479,927
New York Dormitory Authority, (Orchard Park CCRC, Inc.), 5.125%, 11/15/55		960	963,405
Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority, VA, (Fort Norfolk Retirement Community, Inc. - Harbor's Edge), 5.00%, 1/1/49		4,765	4,372,234
North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Twin Lakes Community), 5.25%, 1/1/55		1,955	1,963,310
Palm Beach County Health Facilities Authority, FL, (Green Cay Life Plan Village):
11.50%, 7/1/27⁽¹⁾		1,215	1,743,964
11.50%, 7/1/27⁽¹⁾		130	129,986
Public Finance Authority, WI, (Penick Village), 5.00%, 9/1/39⁽¹⁾		775	781,563
South Carolina Jobs-Economic Development Authority, (Rolling Green Village), 5.75%, 12/1/60		750	746,726
South Carolina Jobs-Economic Development Authority, (Seafields Kiawah Island Project), 7.75%, 11/15/58		3,000	3,214,295
Stamford Housing Authority, CT, (Mozaic Concierge Living), 6.00%, 10/1/40		750	787,374
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., TX, (MRC Stevenson Oaks), 6.625%, 11/15/41		2,640	2,538,044
Tempe Industrial Development Authority, AZ, (Friendship Village of Tempe), 5.625%, 12/1/60		1,065	1,067,890
Tempe Industrial Development Authority, AZ, (Mirabella at ASU), 6.00%, 10/1/37⁽¹⁾		1,200	908,277
Virginia Beach Development Authority, VA, (Westminster-Canterbury on Chesapeake Bay):
7.00%, 9/1/53		3,000	3,302,059
7.00%, 9/1/59		1,000	1,095,665
Washington State Housing Finance Commission, (Horizon House), 6.25%, 1/1/61⁽⁵⁾		5,790	5,741,455
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Three Pillars Senior Living Communities), 5.75%, 8/15/54		1,000	1,029,828
			$ 47,780,609
Special Tax Revenue — 17.4%
Aerotropolis Regional Transportation Authority, CO, 5.75%, 12/1/54⁽¹⁾	$	3,440	$ 3,479,616
Atlanta Development Authority, GA, (Westside Gulch Area), 5.50%, 4/1/39⁽¹⁾		1,640	1,688,552
District of Columbia Income Tax Revenue, 5.25%, 6/1/50⁽³⁾		6,000	6,489,720

Security	Principal Amount (000's omitted)		Value
Special Tax Revenue (continued)
Lakewood Ranch Stewardship District, FL, (Villages of Lakewood Ranch South):
5.125%, 5/1/46	$	1,500	$ 1,500,749
6.00%, 5/1/56		1,000	1,037,860
Maryland Economic Development Corp., (Port Covington), 4.00%, 9/1/50		275	235,101
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.25%, 7/1/55⁽³⁾		6,000	6,453,720
Michigan, (Rebuilding Michigan Program), 5.50%, 11/15/49⁽³⁾		4,000	4,358,400
Mida Mountain Village Public Infrastructure District, UT, 5.125%, 6/15/54⁽¹⁾		2,185	2,181,854
New River Community Development District, FL, (Capital Improvements):
5.00%, 5/1/13⁽⁶⁾		90	0
5.35%, 5/1/38⁽⁶⁾		35	0
5.75%, 5/1/38		110	110,934
New York City Transitional Finance Authority, NY, 5.50%, 5/1/52⁽³⁾		10,000	10,811,900
New York City Transitional Finance Authority, NY, Future Tax Revenue, 3.00%, 11/1/47		2,195	1,686,298
New York Dormitory Authority, Personal Income Tax Revenue, 5.50%, 3/15/53⁽³⁾		9,000	9,788,130
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp.:
0.00%, 7/1/27		179	169,730
0.00%, 7/1/29		261	231,333
0.00%, 7/1/31		316	259,383
0.00%, 7/1/33		357	271,085
0.00%, 7/1/46		3,403	1,160,415
0.00%, 7/1/51		4,523	1,127,207
4.50%, 7/1/34		286	286,080
4.536%, 7/1/53		36	32,837
5.00%, 7/1/58		4,752	4,633,037
Southern Hills Plantation I Community Development District, FL:
Series A1, 5.80%, 5/1/35		168	159,184
Series A2, 5.80%, 5/1/35		155	101,214
Sterling Hill Community Development District, FL, 6.20%, 5/1/35⁽⁴⁾		552	226,227
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, D.C., Green Bonds, 5.25%, 7/15/59⁽³⁾		16,000	16,884,800
			$ 75,365,366
Transportation — 26.9%
Atlanta, GA, Department of Aviation, Green Bonds, (AMT), 5.50%, 7/1/55⁽³⁾	$	10,000	$ 10,647,000

See Notes to Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Portfolio of Investments — continued

Security	Principal Amount (000's omitted)		Value
Transportation (continued)
Charlotte, NC:
5.00%, 7/1/50⁽³⁾	$	5,400	$ 5,716,224
5.25%, 7/1/55		35	37,761
5.25%, 7/1/55⁽³⁾		9,450	10,195,510
Chicago, IL, (O'Hare International Airport), (AMT), 5.50%, 1/1/55⁽³⁾		4,500	4,664,475
Denver City and County, CO, Airport System Revenue, (AMT), 5.75%, 11/15/45		2,500	2,699,705
Gerald R. Ford International Airport Authority, MI:
(AMT), 5.00%, 1/1/54		685	701,942
(AMT), 5.00%, 1/1/54⁽³⁾		11,000	11,272,030
Los Angeles Department of Airports, CA, (Los Angeles International Airport), Green Bonds, (AMT), 5.25%, 5/15/50⁽³⁾		11,000	11,621,390
Massachusetts, (Rail Enhancement Program), Sustainability Bonds, 5.00%, 6/1/53⁽³⁾		6,000	6,247,740
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY, Green Bonds, 5.25%, 11/15/55		3,000	3,087,515
New York Transportation Development Corp., (John F. Kennedy Airport Terminals 6 Redevelopment), Green Bonds, (AMT), 5.50%, 12/31/60		2,830	2,892,915
New York Transportation Development Corp., (John F. Kennedy International Airport):
Green Bonds, (AMT), 5.375%, 6/30/60		2,025	2,032,235
Green Bonds, (AMT), 6.00%, 6/30/54		1,155	1,201,518
New York Transportation Development Corp., (LaGuardia Airport Terminal B Redevelopment):
(AMT), 5.00%, 7/1/41		1,150	1,150,096
(AMT), 5.25%, 1/1/50		1,050	1,049,989
New York Transportation Development Corp., (Terminal 4 John F. Kennedy International Airport), (AMT), 5.00%, 12/1/38		4,550	4,817,802
Oklahoma Turnpike Authority, 5.50%, 1/1/54⁽³⁾		5,000	5,439,500
Philadelphia, PA, Airport Revenue, (AMT), 5.00%, 7/1/47		4,795	4,801,687
Public Finance Authority, WI, (Georgia SR 400 Express Lanes), (AMT), 5.75%, 6/30/60		4,000	4,161,341
San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, CA, (San Diego International Airport), (AMT), 5.00%, 7/1/53		2,530	2,600,784
San Francisco City and County Airport Commission, CA, (San Francisco International Airport), (AMT), 5.25%, 5/1/55⁽³⁾		10,000	10,484,600
South Jersey Transportation Authority, NJ, 5.25%, 11/1/52		1,500	1,556,444
Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp., (North Tarrant Express Segment 3C), (AMT), 5.00%, 6/30/58		4,000	3,912,220

Security	Principal Amount (000's omitted)		Value
Transportation (continued)
Texas Transportation Commission, (State Highway 249 System):
0.00%, 8/1/37	$	725	$ 438,253
0.00%, 8/1/39		750	403,889
Virginia Small Business Financing Authority, (95 Express Lanes, LLC), (AMT), 4.00%, 1/1/39		1,540	1,520,815
Virginia Small Business Financing Authority, (Transform 66 P3 Project), (AMT), 5.00%, 12/31/52		1,000	972,595
			$ 116,327,975
Water and Sewer — 2.6%
JEA Water and Sewer System Revenue, FL, 5.25%, 10/1/55⁽³⁾	$	10,000	$ 10,739,900
King County, WA, Sewer Revenue, (SPA: Bank of America, N.A.), 2.80%, 1/1/42⁽⁷⁾		370	370,000
			$ 11,109,900
Total Tax-Exempt Municipal Obligations (identified cost $591,009,012)			$ 604,993,646

Taxable Municipal Obligations — 5.1%

Security	Principal Amount (000's omitted)		Value
Cogeneration — 0.0%^†
Northampton County Industrial Development Authority, PA, (Northampton Generating), 5.00%, 6/30/27⁽²⁾	$	347	$ 62,483
			$ 62,483
Education — 0.2%
Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, AZ, (Grand Canyon University), 7.375%, 10/1/29⁽¹⁾	$	1,000	$ 1,052,297
			$ 1,052,297
General Obligations — 1.8%
Atlantic City, NJ, 7.50%, 3/1/40	$	6,880	$ 7,928,028
			$ 7,928,028
Housing — 0.7%
New York State Housing Finance Agency, (160 Madison Avenue LLC), (LOC: Landesbank Hessen-Thuringen Girozentrale), 3.84%, 11/1/46⁽⁷⁾	$	3,010	$ 3,010,000
			$ 3,010,000

See Notes to Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Portfolio of Investments — continued

Security	Principal Amount (000's omitted)		Value
Insured - Education — 0.5%
Onondaga Civic Development Corp., NY, (Upstate Properties Development, Inc.), (BAM), 3.158%, 12/1/41	$	2,745	$ 2,137,240
			$ 2,137,240
Insured - Transportation — 1.0%
Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, CA:
(AG), 0.00%, 10/1/48	$	10,765	$ 2,609,492
(AMBAC), 0.00%, 10/1/32		1,285	915,423
(AMBAC), 0.00%, 10/1/33		1,000	672,553
			$ 4,197,468
Lease Revenue/Certificates of Participation — 0.1%
New Hampshire Business Finance Authority, (Centurion BioSquare, Inc.), 9.58%, 12/15/38	$	250	$ 255,605
New Hampshire Business Finance Authority, (Centurion Foundation), 11.00%, 12/15/38		135	137,880
			$ 393,485
Special Tax Revenue — 0.8%
American Samoa Economic Development Authority, 3.72%, 9/1/27⁽¹⁾	$	735	$ 715,129
Oneida Indian Nation of New York, 8.00%, 9/1/40⁽¹⁾		2,500	2,558,110
			$ 3,273,239
Student Loan — 0.0%^†
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, 4.70%, 1/1/30	$	90	$ 90,026
			$ 90,026
Total Taxable Municipal Obligations (identified cost $21,481,374)			$ 22,144,266
Total Investments — 145.8% (identified cost $616,795,386)			$ 631,593,066
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (45.8)%			$(198,485,607)
Net Assets — 100.0%			$ 433,107,459

The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
^†	Amount is less than 0.05% or (0.05)%, as applicable.
⁽¹⁾	Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. These securities may be sold in certain transactions in reliance on an exemption from registration (normally to qualified institutional buyers). At November 30, 2025, the aggregate value of these securities is $46,371,671 or 10.7% of the Trust's net assets.
⁽²⁾	Represents a payment-in-kind security which may pay interest in additional principal at the issuer’s discretion.
⁽³⁾	Security represents the municipal bond held by a trust that issues residual interest bonds (see Note 1G).
⁽⁴⁾	Security is in default and making only partial interest payments.
⁽⁵⁾	When-issued security.
⁽⁶⁾	Defaulted security. Issuer has defaulted on the payment of interest and/or principal or has filed bankruptcy and is non-income producing.
⁽⁷⁾	Variable rate demand obligation that may be tendered at par on any day for payment the same or next business day. The stated interest rate, which generally resets daily, is determined by the remarketing agent and represents the rate in effect at November 30, 2025.
At November 30, 2025, the concentration of the Trust’s investments in the various states and territories, determined as a percentage of total investments, is as follows:

New York	10.6%
California	10.1%
Others, representing less than 10% individually	78.6%

The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. At November 30, 2025, 18.0% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution or financial guaranty assurance agency ranged from 1.3% to 11.1% of total investments.

Abbreviations:
AG	– Assured Guaranty, Inc.
AMBAC	– AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT	– Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
BAM	– Build America Mutual Assurance Co.
FHLMC	– Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
FNMA	– Federal National Mortgage Association
GNMA	– Government National Mortgage Association
LOC	– Letter of Credit
NPFG	– National Public Finance Guarantee Corp.
PSF	– Permanent School Fund
SFMR	– Single Family Mortgage Revenue
SPA	– Standby Bond Purchase Agreement

See Notes to Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Statement of Cash Flows

	Year Ended
	November 30, 2025
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net increase in net assets from operations	$423,472
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets from operations to net cash used in operating activities:
Investments purchased	(318,555,211)
Investments sold	295,483,060
Net amortization/accretion of premium (discount)	(1,560,278)
Increase in interest receivable	(619,472)
Increase in Trustees’ deferred compensation plan	(7,784)
Increase in other assets	(46,926)
Increase in payable to affiliates for investment adviser fee	5,277
Increase in payable to affiliates for administration fee	2,639
Increase in payable to affiliates for Trustees' fees	547
Decrease in interest expense and fees payable	(119,148)
Increase in payable to affiliates for Trustees' deferred compensation plan	7,784
Increase in accrued expenses	12,209
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation from investments	7,519,242
Net realized loss from investments	11,750,878
Net cash used in operating activities	$(5,703,711)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Cash distributions paid to common shareholders	$(24,200,456)
Proceeds from Fund shares sold	1,965,403
Proceeds from secured borrowings	155,360,000
Repayment of secured borrowings	(127,465,000)
Increase in due to custodian	3,782
Net cash provided by financing activities	$5,663,729
Net decrease in cash	$(39,982)
Cash at beginning of year	$39,982
Cash at end of year	$—
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Noncash financing activities not included herein consist of:
Reinvestment of dividends and distributions	$235,540
Cash paid for interest and fees	6,308,935

See Notes to Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Financial Highlights

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

	Year Ended November 30,
	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)	$11.47	$11.11	$11.25	$14.23	$14.13
Income (Loss) From Operations
Net investment income⁽¹⁾	$0.50	$0.45	$0.42	$0.52	$0.61
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)	(0.49)	0.48	(0.09)	(2.94)	0.06
Total income (loss) from operations	$0.01	$0.93	$0.33	$(2.42)	$0.67
Less Distributions to Common Shareholders
From net investment income	$(0.49)	$(0.45)	$(0.43)	$(0.56)	$(0.57)
Tax return of capital	(0.13)	(0.12)	(0.04)	—	—
Total distributions to common shareholders	$(0.62)	$(0.57)	$(0.47)	$(0.56)	$(0.57)
Premium from common shares sold through shelf offering (see Note 5)⁽¹⁾	$0.00⁽²⁾	$—	$—	$—	$—
Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)	$10.86	$11.47	$11.11	$11.25	$14.23
Market value — End of year (Common shares)	$10.90	$10.79	$9.54	$10.25	$13.70
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value⁽³⁾	0.41%	9.07%	3.64%	(16.96)%	4.95%
Total Investment Return on Market Value⁽³⁾	7.13%	19.49%	(2.33)%	(21.41)%	7.75%
Ratios/Supplemental Data
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000’s omitted)	$433,107	$454,919	$440,778	$446,309	$564,424
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares):⁽⁴⁾
Expenses excluding interest and fees	1.01%	0.94%	0.98%	1.04%	0.98%
Interest and fee expense⁽⁵⁾	1.45%	1.40%	1.72%	0.81%	0.29%
Total expenses	2.46%	2.34%	2.70%	1.85%	1.27%
Net expenses	2.46%	2.34%	2.70%	1.85%	1.27%
Net investment income	4.60%	3.99%	3.80%	4.23%	4.28%
Portfolio Turnover	47%	36%	41%	23%	7%

⁽¹⁾	Computed using average common shares outstanding.
⁽²⁾	Amount is less than $0.005.
⁽³⁾	Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested. Distributions are assumed to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Trust's dividend reinvestment plan.
⁽⁴⁾	Total expenses do not reflect amounts reimbursed and/or waived by the adviser and certain of its affiliates, if applicable. Net expenses are net of all reductions and represent the net expenses paid by the Trust.
⁽⁵⁾	Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions (see Note 1G).

See Notes to Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Notes to Financial Statements

1 Significant Accounting Policies

Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust (the Trust) is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a diversified, closed-end management investment company. The Trust seeks to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax.

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Trust. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP). The Trust is an investment company and follows accounting and reporting guidance in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946.

A Investment Valuation—The following methodologies are used to determine the market value or fair value of investments.

Debt Obligations. Debt obligations are generally valued on the basis of valuations provided by third party pricing services, as derived from such services’ pricing models. Inputs to the models may include, but are not limited to, reported trades, executable bid and ask prices, broker/dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, interest rates, anticipated prepayments, benchmark curves or information pertaining to the issuer, as well as industry and economic events. The pricing services may use a matrix approach, which considers information regarding securities with similar characteristics to determine the valuation for a security. Short-term debt obligations purchased with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less for which a valuation from a third party pricing service is not readily available may be valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.

Fair Valuation. In connection with Rule 2a-5 of the 1940 Act, the Trustees have designated the Trust’s investment adviser as its valuation designee. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued by the investment adviser, as valuation designee, at fair value using methods that most fairly reflect the security’s “fair value”, which is the amount that the Trust might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker/dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial statements, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.

B Investment Transactions and Related Income—Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.

C Federal Taxes—The Trust’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its taxable, if any, and tax-exempt net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. The Trust intends to satisfy conditions which will enable it to designate distributions from the interest income generated by its investments in non-taxable municipal securities, which are exempt from regular federal income tax when received by the Trust, as exempt-interest dividends. The portion of such interest, if any, earned on private activity bonds issued after August 7, 1986, may be considered a tax preference item to shareholders.

As of November 30, 2025, the Trust had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. The Trust files a U.S. federal income tax return annually after its fiscal year-end, which is subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a period of three years from the date of filing.

D Legal Fees— Legal fees and other related expenses incurred as part of negotiations of the terms and requirement of capital infusions, or that are expected to result in the restructuring of, or a plan of reorganization for, an investment are recorded as realized losses. Ongoing expenditures to protect or enhance an investment are treated as operating expenses.

E Use of Estimates—The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

F Indemnifications—Under the Trust's organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Trust. Under Massachusetts law, if certain conditions prevail, shareholders of a Massachusetts business trust (such as the Trust) could be deemed to have personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. However, the Trust's Declaration of Trust contains an express disclaimer of liability on the part of Trust shareholders and the By-laws provide that the Trust shall assume, upon request by the shareholder, the defense on behalf of any Trust shareholders. Moreover, the By-laws also provide for indemnification out of Trust property of any shareholder held personally liable solely by reason of being or having been a shareholder for all loss or expense arising from such liability. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Trust enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Trust’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Trust that have not yet occurred.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

G Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities Held—The Trust may invest in residual interest bonds, also referred to as inverse floating rate securities, whereby the Trust may sell a variable or fixed rate bond for cash to a Special-Purpose Vehicle (the SPV), (which is generally organized as a trust), while at the same time, buying a residual interest in the assets and cash flows of the SPV. The bond is deposited into the SPV with the same CUSIP number as the bond sold to the SPV by the Trust, and which may have been, but is not required to be, the bond purchased from the Trust (the Bond). The SPV also issues floating rate notes (Floating Rate Notes) which are sold to third-parties. The residual interest bond held by the Trust gives the Trust the right (1) to cause the holders of the Floating Rate Notes to generally tender their notes at par, and (2) to have the Bond held by the SPV transferred to the Trust, thereby terminating the SPV. Should the Trust exercise such right, it would generally pay the SPV the par amount due on the Floating Rate Notes and exchange the residual interest bond for the underlying Bond. Pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishment of liabilities, the Trust accounts for the transaction described above as a secured borrowing by including the Bond in its Portfolio of Investments and the Floating Rate Notes as a liability under the caption “Payable for floating rate notes issued” in its Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Floating Rate Notes have interest rates that generally reset weekly and their holders have the option to tender their notes to the SPV for redemption at par at each reset date. Accordingly, the fair value of the payable for floating rate notes issued approximates its carrying value. If measured at fair value, the payable for floating rate notes would have been considered as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy (see Note 6) at November 30, 2025. Interest expense
related to the Trust's liability with respect to Floating Rate Notes is recorded as incurred. The SPV may be terminated by the Trust, as noted above, or by the occurrence of certain termination events as defined in the trust agreement, such as a downgrade in the credit quality of the underlying Bond, bankruptcy of or payment failure by the issuer of the underlying Bond, the inability to remarket Floating Rate Notes that have been tendered due to insufficient buyers in the market, or the failure by the SPV to obtain renewal of the liquidity agreement under which liquidity support is provided for the Floating Rate Notes up to one year. Structuring fees paid to the liquidity provider upon the creation of an SPV, if any, are recorded as debt issuance costs and are being amortized as interest expense to the expected maturity of the related trust. Unamortized structuring fees related to a terminated SPV are recorded as a realized loss on extinguishment of debt. At November 30, 2025, the amount of the Trust's Floating Rate Notes outstanding and the related collateral were $199,543,135 and $268,265,995, respectively. The range of interest rates on the Floating Rate Notes outstanding at November 30, 2025 was 2.51% to 2.93%. For the year ended November 30, 2025, the Trust’s average settled Floating Rate Notes outstanding and the average interest rate including fees were $192,447,603 and 3.22%, respectively.

In certain circumstances, the Trust may enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements with brokers by which the Trust agrees to reimburse the broker for the difference between the liquidation value of the Bond held by the SPV and the liquidation value of the Floating Rate Notes, as well as any shortfalls in interest cash flows. The Trust had no shortfalls as of November 30, 2025.

The Trust may also purchase residual interest bonds in a secondary market transaction without first owning the underlying bond. Such transactions are not required to be treated as secured borrowings. Shortfall agreements, if any, related to residual interest bonds purchased in a secondary market transaction are disclosed in the Portfolio of Investments.

The Trust's investment policies and restrictions expressly permit investments in residual interest bonds. Such bonds typically offer the potential for yields exceeding the yields available on fixed rate bonds with comparable credit quality and maturity. These securities tend to underperform the market for fixed rate bonds in a rising long-term interest rate environment, but tend to outperform the market for fixed rate bonds when long-term interest rates decline. The value and income of residual interest bonds are generally more volatile than that of a fixed rate bond. The Trust's investment policies do not allow the Trust to borrow money except as permitted by the 1940 Act. Effective August 19, 2022, the Trust began operating under Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act, which, among other things, governs the use of derivative investments and certain financing transactions by registered investment companies. Consistent with Rule 18f-4, the Trust may treat its investments in residual interest bonds and similar financing transactions as subject to the asset coverage requirements of Section 18 of the 1940 Act, or as derivatives transactions subject to the Trust's value-at-risk (VaR)-based limits on leverage risk. Effective October 11, 2023, the Trust has opted to treat such investments as derivatives transactions. The Trust may change this approach at any time. Residual interest bonds held by the Trust are securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.

H When-Issued Securities and Delayed Delivery Transactions—The Trust may purchase securities on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis. Payment and delivery may take place after the customary settlement period for that security. At the time the transaction is negotiated, the price of the security that will be delivered is fixed. The Trust maintains cash and/or security positions for these commitments such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payments upon settlement. Securities purchased on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis are marked-to-market daily and begin earning interest on settlement date. Such security purchases are subject to the risk that when delivered they will be worth less than the agreed upon payment price. Losses may also arise if the counterparty does not perform under the contract.

I Segment Reporting—During this reporting period, the Trust adopted FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures (ASU 2023-07), which requires incremental disclosures related to a public entity’s reportable segments. The Trust operates as a single reportable segment, an investment company whose investment objective(s) is included in Note 1. In connection with the adoption of ASU 2023-07, the Trust’s President acts as the Trust's Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM), who is responsible for assessing the performance of the Trust's single segment and deciding how to allocate the segment’s resources. To perform this function, the CODM reviews the information in the Trust’s financial statements.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

2 Distributions to Shareholders and Income Tax Information

The Trust intends to make monthly distributions of net investment income to common shareholders. In addition, at least annually, the Trust intends to distribute all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions to shareholders are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP. As required by U.S. GAAP, only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits are reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.

The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended November 30, 2025 and November 30, 2024 was as follows:

	Year Ended November 30,
	2025	2024
Tax-exempt income	$17,931,482	$15,727,691
Ordinary income	$1,502,120	$2,120,305
Tax return of capital	$5,002,394	$4,786,087

As of November 30, 2025, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated loss) on a tax basis were as follows:

Deferred capital losses	$(51,651,199)
Net unrealized appreciation	14,970,080
Accumulated loss	$(36,681,119)

At November 30, 2025, the Trust, for federal income tax purposes, had deferred capital losses of $51,651,199 which would reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus would reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Trust of any liability for federal income or excise tax. The deferred capital losses are treated as arising on the first day of the Trust’s next taxable year and retain the same short-term or long-term character as when originally deferred. Of the deferred capital losses at November 30, 2025, $11,598,111 are short-term and $40,053,088 are long-term.

The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Trust at November 30, 2025, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:

Aggregate cost	$417,079,851
Gross unrealized appreciation	$22,901,460
Gross unrealized depreciation	(7,931,380)
Net unrealized appreciation	$14,970,080

3 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates

The investment adviser fee is earned by Eaton Vance Management (EVM), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Trust. The investment adviser fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.40% of the Trust’s average weekly gross assets and is payable monthly. Gross assets are calculated by deducting accrued liabilities of the Trust except (i) the principal amount of any indebtedness for money borrowed, including debt securities issued by the Trust and the amount of floating rate notes included as a liability in the Trust’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities of up to $289,500,000, and (ii) the amount of any outstanding preferred shares issued by the Trust. The administration fee is earned by EVM for administering the business affairs of the Trust and is computed at an annual rate of 0.20% of the Trust’s average weekly gross assets. For the year ended November 30, 2025, the investment adviser fee and administration fee were $2,481,644 and $1,240,822, respectively.

Trustees and officers of the Trust who are members of EVM’s organization receive remuneration for their services to the Trust out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Trust who are not affiliated with EVM may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. Certain officers and Trustees of the Trust are officers of EVM.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

4 Purchases and Sales of Investments

Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, aggregated $310,279,264 and $295,508,060, respectively, for the year ended November 30, 2025.

5 Common Shares of Beneficial Interest and Shelf Offering

Common shares issued by the Trust pursuant to its dividend reinvestment plan were 22,181 for the year ended November 30, 2025. There were no common shares issued by the Trust for the year ended November 30, 2024.

In November 2013, the Board of Trustees initially approved a share repurchase program for the Trust. Pursuant to the reauthorization of the share repurchase program by the Board of Trustees in March 2019, the Trust is authorized to repurchase up to 10% of its common shares outstanding as of the last day of the prior calendar year at market prices when shares are trading at a discount to net asset value. The share repurchase program does not obligate the Trust to purchase a specific amount of shares. There were no repurchases of common shares by the Trust for the years ended November 30, 2025 and 2024.

Pursuant to a registration statement filed with the SEC, the Trust is authorized to issue up to an additional 2,610,553 common shares through an equity shelf offering program (the “shelf offering”). Under the shelf offering, the Trust, subject to market conditions, may raise additional capital from time to time and in varying amounts and offering methods at a net price at or above the Trust’s net asset value per common share.

During the year ended November 30, 2025, the Trust sold 178,476 common shares and received proceeds (net of offering costs) of $1,965,403 through its shelf offering. The net proceeds in excess of the net asset value of the shares sold were $38,305 for the year ended November 30, 2025. Offering costs (other than the applicable sales commissions) incurred in connection with the shelf offering were borne directly by EVM. Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM, is the distributor of the Trust’s shares and is entitled to receive a sales commission from the Trust of 1.00% of the gross sales price per share, a portion of which is re-allowed to sales agents. The Trust was informed that the sales commissions retained by EVD during the year ended November 30, 2025 were $3,971. During the year ended November 30, 2024, there were no shares sold by the Trust pursuant to its shelf offering.

6 Fair Value Measurements

Under generally accepted accounting principles for fair value measurements, a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, is used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.

•	Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments
•	Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
•	Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund's own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)

In cases where the inputs used to measure fair value fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level disclosed is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

At November 30, 2025, the hierarchy of inputs used in valuing the Trust's investments, which are carried at fair value, were as follows:

Asset Description	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Total
Corporate Bonds	$ —	$ 4,455,154	$ —	$ 4,455,154
Tax-Exempt Municipal Obligations	—	604,993,646	—	604,993,646
Taxable Municipal Obligations	—	22,144,266	—	22,144,266
Total Investments	$ —	$631,593,066	$ —	$631,593,066

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Trustees and Shareholders of Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust:

Opinion on the Financial Statements and Financial Highlights

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust (the “Trust”), including the portfolio of investments, as of November 30, 2025, the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements and financial highlights”). In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Trust as of November 30, 2025, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Trust's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Trust's financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Trust in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Trust is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of November 30, 2025, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; when replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
January 21, 2026

We have served as the auditor of one or more Eaton Vance investment companies since 1959.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Dividend Reinvestment Plan

The Trust offers a dividend reinvestment plan (Plan) pursuant to which shareholders automatically have distributions reinvested in common shares (Shares) of the Trust unless they elect otherwise through their investment dealer. On the distribution payment date, if the NAV per Share is equal to or less than the market price per Share plus estimated brokerage commissions, then new Shares will be issued. The number of Shares shall be determined by the greater of the NAV per Share or 95% of the market price. Otherwise, Shares generally will be purchased on the open market by Equiniti Trust Company, LLC (“EQ”), the Plan agent (Agent). Distributions subject to income tax (if any) are taxable whether or not Shares are reinvested.

If your Shares are in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, you can ask the firm or nominee to participate in the Plan on your behalf. If the nominee does not offer the Plan, you will need to request that the Trust’s transfer agent re-register your Shares in your name or you will not be able to participate.

The Agent’s service fee for handling distributions will be paid by the Trust. Plan participants will be charged their pro rata share of brokerage commissions on all open-market purchases.

Plan participants may withdraw from the Plan at any time by writing to the Agent at the address noted on the following page. If you withdraw, you will receive Shares in your name for all Shares credited to your account under the Plan. If a participant elects by written notice to the Agent to sell part or all of his or her Shares and remit the proceeds, the Agent is authorized to deduct a $5.00 fee plus brokerage commissions from the proceeds.

If you wish to participate in the Plan and your Shares are held in your own name, you may complete the form on the following page and deliver it to the Agent. Any inquiries regarding the Plan can be directed to the Agent at 1-866-439-6787.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Board of Trustees’ Contract Approval

Overview of the Contract Review Process

The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that the investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year-to-year only if its continuation is approved on an annual basis by a vote of the fund’s board of trustees, including a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“independent trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.

At a meeting held on June 12, 2025, the Boards of Trustees/Directors (collectively, the “Board”) that oversee the registered investment companies advised by Eaton Vance Management or its affiliate, Boston Management and Research (the “Eaton Vance Funds”), including a majority of the independent trustees (the “Independent Trustees”), voted to approve the continuation of existing investment advisory agreements and sub-advisory agreements¹ for each of the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. The Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of its Contract Review Committee, which is a committee comprised of all of the Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished by the adviser and sub-adviser to each of the Eaton Vance Funds (including information specifically requested by the Board) for a series of meetings held between April and June 2025, as well as certain additional information provided in response to specific requests from the Independent Trustees as members of the Contract Review Committee. Members of the Contract Review Committee also considered information received at prior meetings of the Board and its committees, to the extent such information was relevant to the Contract Review Committee’s annual evaluation of the investment advisory agreements and sub-advisory agreements.

In connection with its evaluation of the investment advisory agreements and sub-advisory agreements, the Board (directly or through one or more of its committees) considered various information relating to the Eaton Vance Funds. This included information applicable to all or groups of the Eaton Vance Funds, which is referenced immediately below, and information applicable to the particular Eaton Vance Fund covered by this report (each Eaton Vance Fund is referred to below as a “fund”). (For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, references to “each fund” in this section may include information that was considered at the portfolio-level.)

Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses

• A report from an independent data provider comparing advisory and other fees paid by each fund to such fees paid by comparable funds, as identified by the independent data provider (“comparable funds”);

• A report from an independent data provider comparing each fund’s total expense ratio (and its components) to those of comparable funds;

• A report from an independent data provider comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds and, as applicable, benchmark indices, over various time periods;

• In certain instances, data regarding investment performance relative to customized groups of peer funds and blended indices identified by the adviser in consultation with the Portfolio Management Committee of the Board (a committee exclusively comprised of Independent Trustees);

• Comparative information concerning the fees charged and services provided by the adviser and sub-adviser to each fund in managing other accounts (which may include other funds, collective investment trusts and institutional accounts) with the same or substantially similar investment objective as the fund and with a significant overlap in holdings based on criteria set by the Board, if any;

• Profitability analyses on a fund-by-fund basis for the adviser and its affiliates and for each sub-adviser not affiliated with the adviser;

Information about Portfolio Management and Trading

• Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, as well as each of the funds’ investment strategies and policies;

• The procedures and processes used by the adviser to determine the value of fund assets, including, when necessary, the determination of “fair value” by the adviser in its role as each fund’s valuation designee and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes;

• Information about the policies and practices of each fund’s adviser and sub-adviser with respect to trading, including their processes for seeking best execution of portfolio transactions;

• Information about the allocation of brokerage transactions and the benefits, if any, received by the adviser and sub-adviser to each fund as a result of brokerage allocation, including, as applicable, information concerning the acquisition of research through client commission arrangements and policies with respect to “soft dollars”;

• Data relating to the portfolio turnover rate of each fund and related information regarding active management in the context of particular strategies;

Information about each Adviser and Sub-Adviser

• Reports regarding the financial results and condition of the adviser and certain of its affiliates and of each sub-adviser not affiliated with the adviser;

¹ Not all Eaton Vance Funds have entered into a sub-advisory agreement with a sub-adviser. Accordingly, references to “sub-adviser” or “sub-advisory agreement” in this “Overview” section may not be applicable to the particular Eaton Vance Fund covered by this report. Eaton Vance Management and Boston Management and Research are referred to collectively as the “adviser.”

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Board of Trustees’ Contract Approval — continued

• Information regarding the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and, for portfolio managers and certain other investment professionals, information relating to their responsibilities with respect to managing other funds and investment accounts, as applicable;

• Information regarding the adviser’s and its parent company’s (Morgan Stanley’s) efforts to retain and attract talented investment professionals, including in the context of a competitive marketplace for talent;

• Information regarding the adviser’s compensation methodology for its investment professionals and the incentives and accountability it creates, along with investment professionals’ investments in the fund(s) they manage;

• The personal trading codes of ethics of the adviser and its affiliates and the sub-adviser of each fund, together with information relating to compliance with, and the administration of, such codes;

• Policies and procedures relating to proxy voting, including regular reporting with respect to fund proxy voting activities;

• Information regarding the handling of corporate actions and class actions, as well as information regarding litigation and other regulatory matters;

• Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by the adviser and its affiliates and the sub-adviser of each fund, including descriptions of their various compliance programs and their record of compliance and remediation;

• Information concerning the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of the adviser and its affiliates and the sub-adviser of each fund;

• A description of the adviser’s oversight of sub-advisers, including with respect to regulatory and compliance issues, investment management and other matters, if any;

Other Relevant Information

• Information regarding ongoing initiatives to further integrate and harmonize, where applicable, the investment management and other departments of the adviser and its affiliates with the overall investment management infrastructure of Morgan Stanley, in light of Morgan Stanley’s acquisition of Eaton Vance Corp. on March 1, 2021;

• Information concerning the nature, cost, and character of the administrative and other non-investment advisory services provided by the adviser and its affiliates;

• Information concerning oversight of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians, fund accountants, and other third-party service providers by the adviser and/or administrator to each of the funds;

• Information concerning efforts to maintain policies and procedures with respect to various regulations applicable to the funds, including, without limitation, Rule 22e-4 (the Liquidity Risk Management Rule), Rule 12d1-4 (the Fund-of-Funds Rule), Rule 18f-4 (the Derivatives Rule), and Rule 2a-5 (the Fair Valuation Rule);

• For the Eaton Vance Fund structured as an interval fund, information regarding the interval fund’s periodic repurchase offers under Rule 23c-3 and related policies and procedures;

• For each Eaton Vance Fund structured as an exchange-listed closed-end fund, information concerning the benefits of the closed-end fund structure, as well as, where relevant, the closed-end fund’s market prices (including as compared to the closed-end fund’s net asset value (NAV)), trading volume data, continued use of auction preferred shares (where applicable), distribution rates, and other relevant matters;

• The risks that the adviser and/or its affiliates incur in connection with the management and operation of the funds, including, among others, litigation, regulatory, entrepreneurial, data privacy and cybersecurity, and other business risks (and the associated costs of such risks, if any); and

• The terms of each investment advisory agreement and sub-advisory agreement.

During the various meetings of the Board and its committees over the course of the year leading up to the June 12, 2025 meeting, the Board and its committees received information from portfolio managers and other investment professionals of the adviser and sub-advisers of the funds regarding investment and performance matters, and considered various investment and trading strategies used in pursuing the funds’ investment objectives. The Board and its committees also received information regarding risk management techniques employed in connection with the management of the funds. The Board and its committees evaluated issues pertaining to industry and regulatory developments, compliance procedures, fund governance, and other issues with respect to the funds, and received and participated in reports and presentations provided by the adviser, sub-advisers, and certain other service providers, with respect to such matters. In addition to the formal meetings of the Board and its committees, the Independent Trustees met in executive sessions and held regular video or telephone conferences to discuss, among other topics, matters relating to the continuation of investment advisory agreements and sub-advisory agreements.

Each of the Contract Review Committee and the Board was advised throughout the contract review process by Kirkland & Ellis LLP, independent legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee and the members of the Board, with the advice of such counsel, exercised their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each investment advisory agreement and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each investment advisory agreement and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee and Board may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each investment advisory agreement and sub-advisory agreement. In evaluating each investment advisory agreement and sub-advisory agreement, including the fee structures and other terms contained in such agreements, the members of the Contract Review Committee and Board were also informed by multiple years of analysis and discussion with the adviser and sub-adviser to each of the Eaton Vance Funds.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Board of Trustees’ Contract Approval — continued

Results of the Contract Review Process

Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuation of the investment advisory agreement between Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust (the “Fund”) and Eaton Vance Management (the “Adviser”), including its fee structure, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, recommended to the Board approval of the agreement. Based on the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund.

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services

In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement for the Fund, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by the Adviser.

The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment processes in light of the types of investments held by the Fund, including the education and experience of the investment professionals who provide services to the Fund. In particular, the Board considered the abilities and experience of the Adviser’s investment professionals in analyzing factors such as credit risk, tax efficiency, and special considerations relevant to investing in municipal bonds. The Board considered the Adviser’s municipal bond team, which includes portfolio managers and credit specialists who provide services to the Fund. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, the compensation methods of the Adviser and other factors, including the reputation and resources of the Adviser to recruit and retain highly qualified research, advisory and supervisory investment professionals. In addition, the Board considered the time and attention devoted to the Eaton Vance Funds, including the Fund, by senior management, as well as the infrastructure, operational capabilities and support staff in place to assist in the portfolio management and operations of the Fund, including the provision of administrative services. The Board also considered the business-related and other risks to which the Adviser or its affiliates may be subject in managing the Fund. The Board considered the deep experience of the Adviser and its affiliates with managing and operating funds organized as exchange-listed closed-end funds, such as the Fund. In this regard, the Board considered, among other things, the Adviser’s and its affiliates’ experience with implementing leverage arrangements, monitoring and assessing trading price discounts and premiums and adhering to the requirements of securities exchanges.

The Board considered the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. The Board considered compliance and reporting matters regarding, among other things, personal trading by investment professionals, disclosure of portfolio holdings, compliance with policies and procedures, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also considered relevant examinations of the Adviser and its affiliates by regulatory authorities, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

The Board considered other administrative services provided or overseen by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large fund complex offering exposure to a variety of asset classes and investment disciplines.

After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement.

Fund Performance

The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to that of comparable funds identified by an independent data provider (the peer group), as well as an appropriate benchmark index, and assessed the Fund’s performance on the basis of total return and current income return. The Board’s review included comparative performance data with respect to the Fund for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2024. In this regard, the Board noted that the performance of the Fund was consistent with the median performance of the Fund’s peer group for the three-year period. The Board also noted that the performance of the Fund was lower than its primary performance benchmark index for the three-year period. The Board considered, among other things, the Adviser’s efforts to generate competitive levels of tax-exempt current income over time through investments that focus on higher quality municipal bonds that often have longer maturities. The Board concluded that the performance of the Fund was satisfactory.

Management Fees and Expenses

The Board considered contractual fee rates payable by the Fund for advisory and administrative services (referred to collectively as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the Fund’s management fees and total expense ratio for the one-year period ended December 31, 2024, as compared to those of comparable funds, before and after giving effect to any undertaking to waive fees or reimburse expenses. The Board also considered certain factors identified by management in response to inquiries from the Contract Review Committee regarding the Fund’s total expense ratio relative to comparable funds. Additionally, the Board took into account the financial resources committed by the Adviser in structuring the Fund at the time of its initial public offering and the waiver of fees provided by the Adviser for the first five years of the Fund’s life. The Board also considered that, following discussions with the Contract Review Committee, the Adviser had implemented a series of permanent reductions in management fees beginning in May 2010, which had been fully implemented as of December 31, 2024.

After considering the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services are reasonable.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Board of Trustees’ Contract Approval — continued

Profitability and “Fall-Out” Benefits

The Board considered the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to marketing support or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution or other services.

The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are not excessive.

The Board also considered direct or indirect fall-out benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with their respective relationships with the Fund, including the benefits of research services that may be available to the Adviser as a result of securities transactions effected for the Fund and other investment advisory clients.

Economies of Scale

In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from economies of scale, if any, with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. To assist in the evaluation of the sharing of any economies of scale, the Board received data for recent years showing asset levels, Adviser profitability and total expense ratios. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the Fund currently shares in the benefits from economies of scale, if any, when they are realized by the Adviser. The Board also considered the fact that the Fund is not continuously offered in the same manner as an open-end fund and that, notwithstanding that the Fund is authorized to issue additional common shares through a shelf offering, the Fund’s assets are not expected to increase materially in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the Board did not find that the implementation of breakpoints in the advisory fee schedule is warranted at this time.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Management and Organization

Fund Management. The Board of Trustees of the Fund (the “Board”) is responsible for the overall management and supervision of the affairs of the Fund. The Board members and officers of the Fund are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Each Trustee holds office until the annual meeting for the year in which his or her term expires and until his or her successor is elected and qualified, subject to a prior death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal. Under the terms of the Fund’s current Trustee retirement policy, an Independent Trustee must retire and resign as a Trustee on the earlier of: (i) the first day of July following his or her 76th birthday; or (ii), with limited exception, December 31st of the 20th year in which he or she has served as a Trustee. However, if such retirement and resignation would cause the Fund to be out of compliance with Section 16 of the 1940 Act or any other regulations or guidance of the Securities and Exchange Commission, then such retirement and resignation will not become effective until such time as action has been taken for the Fund to be in compliance therewith. The “noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Fund, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Board member and officer is One Post Office Square, Boston, Massachusetts 02109. As used below, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “EV” refers to EV LLC, “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “MSIM” refers to Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EV is the trustee of each of EVM and BMR. Each of EVM, BMR, EVD and EV are indirect, wholly owned subsidiaries of Morgan Stanley. Each officer affiliated with EVM may hold a position with other EVM affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below. Each Trustee oversees 123 funds in the Eaton Vance fund complex (including both funds and portfolios in a hub and spoke structure).

Name and Year of Birth	Fund Position(s)	Length of Service	Principal Occupation(s) and Other Directorships During Past Five Years and Other Relevant Experience
Noninterested Trustees
Alan C. Bowser 1962	Class III Trustee	Until 2026. 3 years. Since 2023.	Private investor. Formerly, Co-Head of the Americas Region, Chief Diversity Officer, Partner and a Member of the Operating Committee, at Bridgewater Associates, an asset management firm (2011- 2023). Formerly, Managing Director and Head of Investment Services at UBS Wealth Management Americas (2007-2010). Formerly, Managing Director and Head of Client Solutions, Citibank Private Bank (1999–2007). Other Directorships. Independent Director of Stout Risius Ross (a middle market professional services advisory firm) (since 2021).
Cynthia E. Frost 1961	Class I Trustee	Until 2027. 3 years. Since 2014.	Private investor. Formerly, Chief Investment Officer of Brown University (university endowment) (2000-2012). Formerly, Portfolio Strategist for Duke Management Company (university endowment manager) (1995-2000). Formerly, Managing Director, Cambridge Associates (investment consulting company) (1989-1995). Formerly, Consultant, Bain and Company (management consulting firm) (1987-1989). Formerly, Senior Equity Analyst, BA Investment Management Company (1983-1985). Other Directorships. None.
George J. Gorman 1952	Class I Trustee	Until 2027. 3 years. Since 2014.	Principal at George J. Gorman LLC (consulting firm). Formerly, Senior Partner at Ernst & Young LLP (a registered public accounting firm) (1974-2009). Other Directorships. None.
Valerie A. Mosley 1960	Class I Trustee	Until 2027. 3 years. Since 2014.	Private investor. Chairwoman and Chief Executive Officer of Valmo Ventures (a consulting and investment firm). Founder of Upward Wealth, Inc., dba BrightUp, a fintech platform. Formerly, Partner and Senior Vice President, Portfolio Manager and Investment Strategist at Wellington Management Company, LLP (investment management firm) (1992-2012). Formerly, Chief Investment Officer, PG Corbin Asset Management (1990-1992). Formerly worked in institutional corporate bond sales at Kidder Peabody (1986-1990). Other Directorships. Director of DraftKings, Inc. (digital sports entertainment and gaming company) (since September 2020). Formerly, Director of Dynex Capital, Inc. (mortgage REIT) (2013-2020), Groupon, Inc. (e-commerce provider) (2020-2022), and Envestnet, Inc. (provider of intelligent systems for wealth management and financial wellness) (2018-2024).
Keith Quinton 1958	Class III Trustee	Until 2026. 3 years. Since 2018.	Private investor, researcher and lecturer. Formerly, Independent Investment Committee Member at New Hampshire Retirement System (2017-2021). Formerly, Portfolio Manager and Senior Quantitative Analyst at Fidelity Investments (investment management firm) (2001-2014). Other Directorships. Formerly, Director (2016-2021) and Chairman (2019-2021) of New Hampshire Municipal Bond Bank.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Management and Organization — continued

Name and Year of Birth	Fund Position(s)	Length of Service	Principal Occupation(s) and Other Directorships During Past Five Years and Other Relevant Experience
Noninterested Trustees (continued)
Marcus L. Smith 1966	Class III Trustee	Until 2026. 3 years. Since 2018.	Private investor and independent corporate director. Formerly, Chief Investment Officer, Canada (2012-2017), Chief Investment Officer, Asia (2010-2012), Director of Asian Research (2004-2010) and portfolio manager (2001-2017) at MFS Investment Management (investment management firm). Other Directorships. Director of First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (an industrial REIT) (since 2021). Director of MSCI Inc. (global provider of investment decision support tools) (since 2017).
Nancy Wiser Stefani 1967	Class II Trustee	Until 2028. 3 years. Since 2022.	Private investor. Formerly, Executive Vice President, Global Head of Operations, Wells Fargo Asset Management (2011-2021) and Treasurer of Wells Fargo open-end and closed-end funds (2012-2021); Chief Operating Officer and Chief Compliance Officer at LightBox Capital Management (2008-2011) and GMN Capital Management (2006-2007). Other Directorships. None.
Susan J. Sutherland 1957	Class II Trustee	Until 2028. 3 years. Since 2015.	Private investor. Director of Ascot Underwriting Limited (since 2023), a UK based subsidiary of Ascot Group Limited (insurance and reinsurance). Formerly, Director of Ascot Group Limited (2017-2025), Director of Hagerty Holding Corp. (insurance) (2015-2018) and Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd. (insurance and reinsurance) (2013-2015). Formerly, Associate, Counsel and Partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (law firm) (1982-2013). Other Directorships. Formerly, Director of Kairos Acquisition Corp. (insurance/InsurTech acquisition company) (2021-2023).
Scott E. Wennerholm 1959	Chairperson of the Board and Class II Trustee	Until 2028. 3 years. Chairperson of the Board since 2025 and Trustee since 2016.	Private investor. Formerly, Trustee at Wheelock College (postsecondary institution) (2012-2018). Formerly, Consultant at GF Parish Group (executive recruiting firm) (2016-2017). Formerly, Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President at BNY Mellon Asset Management (investment management firm) (2005-2011). Formerly, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer at Natixis Global Asset Management (investment management firm) (1997-2004). Formerly, Vice President at Fidelity Investments Institutional Services (investment management firm) (1994-1997). Other Directorships. None.

Name and Year of Birth	Fund Position(s)	Length of Service	Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
Kenneth A. Topping 1966	President	Since 2023	Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of EVM and BMR and Chief Operating Officer for Public Markets at MSIM. Also Vice President of Calvert Research and Management (“CRM”) since 2021. Formerly, Chief Operating Officer for Goldman Sachs Asset Management ‘Classic’ (2009-2020).
Deidre E. Walsh 1971	Vice President and Chief Legal Officer	Since 2009	Vice President of EVM and BMR. Also Vice President of CRM.
James F. Kirchner 1967	Treasurer	Since 2007	Vice President of EVM and BMR. Also Vice President of CRM.
Nicholas S. Di Lorenzo 1987	Secretary	Since 2022	Formerly, associate (2012-2021) and counsel (2022) at Dechert LLP.
Laura T. Donovan 1976	Chief Compliance Officer	Since 2024	Vice President of EVM and BMR.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Funds

U.S. Customer Privacy Notice

March 2024

FACTS

WHAT DOES EATON VANCE DO WITH YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION?

Why?	Financial companies choose how they share your personal information. Federal law gives consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal law also requires us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand what we do.

What?	The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service you have with us. This information can include: ■ Social Security number and income ■ investment experience and risk tolerance ■ checking account information and wire transfer instructions

How?	All financial companies need to share customers’ personal information to run their everyday business. In the section below, we list the reasons financial companies can share their customers’ personal information; the reasons Eaton Vance chooses to share; and whether you can limit this sharing.

Reasons we can share your personal information	Does Eaton Vance share?	Can you limit this sharing?
For our everyday business purposes — such as to process your transactions, maintain your account(s), respond to court orders and legal investigations, or report to credit bureaus	Yes	No
For our marketing purposes — to offer our products and services to you	Yes	No
For joint marketing with other financial companies	No	We don’t share
For our affiliates’ everyday business purposes — information about your transactions and experiences	Yes	No*
For our affiliates’ everyday business purposes — information about your creditworthiness	Yes	Yes*
For our affiliates to market to you	Yes	Yes*
For nonaffiliates to market to you	No	We don’t share

To limit our sharing	Call toll-free 1-800-262-1122 or email: [email protected] Please note: If you are a new customer, we can begin sharing your information 30 days from the date we sent this notice. When you are no longer our customer, we continue to share your information as described in this notice. However, you can contact us at any time to limit our sharing.
Questions?	Call toll-free 1-800-262-1122 or email: [email protected]

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Funds

U.S. Customer Privacy Notice — continued

March 2024

Page 2

Who we are
Who is providing this notice?	Eaton Vance Management and our investment management affiliates (“Eaton Vance”) (see Affiliates definition below.)
What we do
How does Eaton Vance protect my personal information?	To protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use, we use security measures that comply with federal law. These measures include computer safeguards and secured files and buildings. We have policies governing the proper handling of customer information by personnel and requiring third parties that provide support to adhere to appropriate security standards with respect to such information.
How does Eaton Vance collect my personal information?	We collect your personal information, for example, when you ■ open an account or make deposits or withdrawals from your account ■ buy securities from us or make a wire transfer ■ give us your contact information We also collect your personal information from others, such as credit bureaus, affiliates, or other companies.
Why can’t I limit all sharing?	Federal law gives you the right to limit only ■ sharing for affiliates’ everyday business purposes — information about your creditworthiness ■ affiliates from using your information to market to you ■ sharing for nonaffiliates to market to you State laws and individual companies may give you additional rights to limit sharing. (See below for more on your rights under state law.)
What happens when I limit sharing for an account I hold jointly with someone else?	Your choices will apply to everyone on your account.
Definitions
Affiliates	Companies related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. ■ Our affiliates include registered investment advisers such as Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Advisers International Ltd., Boston Management and Research, Calvert Research and Management, Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC, Atlanta Capital Management Company LLC, Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc., Morgan Stanley Investment Management Co.; registered broker-dealers such as Morgan Stanley Distributors Inc. and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (together, the “Investment Management Affiliates”); and companies with a Morgan Stanley name and financial companies such as Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co. (the “Morgan Stanley Affiliates”).
Nonaffiliates	Companies not related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. ■ Eaton Vance does not share with nonaffiliates so they can market to you.
Joint marketing	A formal agreement between nonaffiliated financial companies that together market financial products or services to you. ■ Eaton Vance does not jointly market.
Other important information

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Potential Conflicts of Interest

As a diversified global financial services firm, Morgan Stanley, the parent company of the investment adviser, engages in a broad spectrum of activities, including financial advisory services, investment management activities, lending, commercial banking, sponsoring and managing private investment funds, engaging in broker-dealer transactions and principal securities, commodities and foreign exchange transactions, research publication and other activities. In the ordinary course of its business, Morgan Stanley is a full-service investment banking and financial services firm and therefore engages in activities where Morgan Stanley’s interests or the interests of its clients may conflict with the interests of a Fund or Portfolio, if applicable, (collectively for the purposes of this section, “Fund” or “Funds”). Morgan Stanley advises clients and sponsors, manages or advises other investment funds and investment programs, accounts and businesses (collectively, together with any new or successor funds, programs, accounts or businesses sponsored, managed, or advised by the investment adviser or one of its investment adviser affiliates, the “Affiliated Investment Accounts”) with a wide variety of investment objectives that in some instances may overlap or conflict with a Fund’s investment objectives and present conflicts of interest. In addition, Morgan Stanley, the investment adviser and/or the investment adviser’s investment adviser affiliates may also from time to time create new or successor Affiliated Investment Accounts that may compete with a Fund and present similar conflicts of interest. The discussion below enumerates certain actual, apparent and potential conflicts of interest. There is no assurance that conflicts of interest will be resolved in favor of Fund shareholders and, in fact, they may not be. The conflicts herein do not purport to be a complete list or explanation of the conflicts associated with the financial or other interests the investment adviser or its affiliates may have now or in the future. Conflicts of interest not described below may also exist. References to the investment adviser in this section include a Fund’s affiliated sub-adviser (if any) unless otherwise noted.

The discussions below with respect to actual, apparent and potential conflicts of interest may be applicable to or arise from the Affiliated Investment Accounts managed by the investment adviser’s investment adviser affiliates whether or not specifically identified.

Material Non-Public and Other Information. It is expected that confidential or material non-public information regarding an investment or potential investment opportunity may become available to the investment adviser. If such information becomes available, the investment adviser may be precluded (including by applicable law or internal policies or procedures) from pursuing an investment or disposition opportunity with respect to such investment or disposition opportunity including for an extended period of time. The investment adviser may also from time to time be subject to contractual “stand-still” obligations and/or confidentiality obligations that may restrict its ability to transact in certain investments on the Fund’s behalf. In addition, the investment adviser may be precluded from disclosing such information to an investment team, even in circumstances in which the information would be beneficial if disclosed. Therefore, the investment team may not be provided access to material non-public information in the possession of Morgan Stanley that might be relevant to an investment decision to be made on behalf of the Fund, and the investment team may initiate a transaction or sell an investment that, if such information had been known to it, may not have been undertaken. In addition, certain members of the investment team may be recused from certain investment-related discussions so that such members do not receive information that would limit their ability to perform functions of their employment with the investment adviser or its affiliates unrelated to that of the Fund. Furthermore, access to information held by certain parts of Morgan Stanley may be subject to third party confidentiality obligations and to information barriers established by Morgan Stanley designed to manage potential conflicts of interest and regulatory restrictions, including, without limitation, joint transaction restrictions pursuant to the 1940 Act. Accordingly, the investment adviser’s ability to source investments from, or invest alongside, other business units within Morgan Stanley may be limited and there can be no assurance that the investment adviser will be able to source any investments from any one or more parts of the Morgan Stanley network.

The investment adviser may restrict its investment decisions and activities on behalf of the Fund in various circumstances, including because of applicable regulatory requirements or information held by the investment adviser, the investment adviser’s investment adviser affiliates or Morgan Stanley. The investment adviser might not engage in transactions or other activities for, or enforce certain rights in favor of, the Fund due to Morgan Stanley’s activities outside the Fund. Furthermore, Morgan Stanley could have an interest that is different from, and potentially adverse to, that of the Fund, which may impede the Fund from participating in certain opportunities. In instances where trading of an investment is restricted, the investment adviser may not be able to purchase or sell such investment on behalf of the Fund including for an extended period of time, resulting in the Fund’s inability to participate in certain desirable transactions. This inability to buy or sell an investment could have an adverse effect on the Fund’s portfolio due to, among other things, changes in an investment’s value during the period its trading is restricted.

Morgan Stanley has established certain information barriers and other policies designed to address the sharing of information between different businesses within Morgan Stanley. As a result of information barriers, the investment adviser, in certain instances, will not have access, or will have limited access, to certain information and personnel in other areas of Morgan Stanley and, in such instances, will not manage the Fund with the benefit of the information held by such other areas. Morgan Stanley, due to its access to and knowledge of funds, markets and securities based on its various businesses, may make decisions based on information or take (or refrain from taking) actions with respect to interests in investments of the kind held (directly or indirectly) by the Fund in a manner that may be adverse to the Fund, and will not have any obligation or other duty to share information with the investment adviser.

In other instances, Morgan Stanley personnel, including personnel of the investment adviser, will have access to information and personnel of its affiliates. For example, the investment adviser may, in certain instances, share information with its affiliates regarding due diligence of companies and other investment-related due diligence. The investment adviser may face conflicts of interest in determining whether to engage in the sharing of information with its affiliates. Information sharing may limit or restrict the ability of the investment adviser to engage in or otherwise effect transactions on behalf of the Fund (including purchasing or selling securities that the investment adviser may otherwise have purchased or sold for the Fund in the absence of the sharing of information). Also, it may adversely affect the Fund's investments, ability to invest in, or divest from, a company or engage in transactions or otherwise disadvantage the Fund. In managing conflicts of interest that arise because of the foregoing, the investment adviser generally will be subject to fiduciary requirements. The investment adviser may also implement internal information barriers or ethical walls or other internal information sharing protocols, and the conflicts described herein with respect to information barriers and otherwise with respect to Morgan Stanley and the investment adviser will also apply

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Potential Conflicts of Interest — continued

internally within the investment adviser. As a result, the Fund may not be permitted to transact in (e.g., dispose of a security in whole or in part) during periods when it otherwise would have been desirable and able to do so, which could adversely affect the Fund. Other investors in the security that are not subject to such restrictions may be able to transact in the security during such periods. There may also be circumstances in which, as a result of information held by certain portfolio management teams in the investment adviser, the investment adviser limits an activity or transaction for the Fund, including if the Fund is managed by a portfolio management team other than the team holding such information.

Morgan Stanley and its personnel will not be under any obligation or other duty to share certain information with the investment adviser or personnel involved in decision-making for Affiliated Investment Accounts (including the Fund), as applicable, and the investment adviser may make investment decisions for the Fund that differ from those the investment adviser would have made if Morgan Stanley, or other parts, of the investment adviser had provided such information, and the Fund be disadvantaged as a result thereof. Additionally, different portfolio management teams within the investment adviser may make decisions based on information or take (or refrain from taking) actions with respect to Affiliated Investment Accounts they advise in a manner different than or adverse to the Fund.

Investments by Morgan Stanley and its Affiliated Investment Accounts. In serving in multiple capacities to Affiliated Investment Accounts, Morgan Stanley, including the investment adviser and its investment teams, may have obligations to other clients or investors in Affiliated Investment Accounts, the fulfillment of which may not be in the best interests of the Fund or its shareholders. An investment team may have obligations to Affiliated Investment Accounts managed by both the investment adviser and one or more of the investment adviser’s investment adviser affiliates. The Fund’s investment objectives may overlap with the investment objectives of certain Affiliated Investment Accounts. As a result, the members of an investment team may face conflicts in the allocation of investment opportunities among the Fund and other investment funds, programs, accounts and businesses advised by or affiliated with the investment adviser or its investment adviser affiliates. Certain Affiliated Investment Accounts may provide for higher management or incentive fees or greater expense reimbursements or overhead allocations, all of which may contribute to this conflict of interest and create an incentive for the investment adviser to favor such other accounts.

Morgan Stanley currently invests and plans to continue to invest on its own behalf and on behalf of its Affiliated Investment Accounts in a wide variety of investment opportunities globally. Morgan Stanley and its Affiliated Investment Accounts, to the extent consistent with applicable law and policies and procedures, will be permitted to invest in investment opportunities without making such opportunities available to the Fund. Subject to the foregoing, Morgan Stanley may offer investments that fall into the investment objectives of an Affiliated Investment Account to such account or make such investment on its own behalf, even though such investment also falls within the Fund’s investment objectives. The Fund may invest in opportunities that Morgan Stanley and/or one or more Affiliated Investment Accounts has declined, and vice versa. All of the foregoing may reduce the number of investment opportunities available to the Fund and may create conflicts of interest in allocating investment opportunities. Investors should note that the conflicts inherent in making such allocation decisions may not always be resolved to the Fund’s advantage. There can be no assurance that the Fund will have an opportunity to participate in certain opportunities that fall within their investment objectives. The interests of Morgan Stanley in an investment or a company may present certain conflicts of interest with respect to an investment by the Fund in the same investment or the Fund's participation in a transaction with such company.

To the extent the investment adviser utilizes quantitative models or risk management or optimization investment techniques, the decision on when to initiate a purchase or sale transaction may differ, and be done for different reasons, than the investment adviser or its affiliates take on Affiliated Investment Accounts on the same securities when not utilizing such techniques. This could create conflicts of interest, and it is possible that one or more accounts managed by the investment adviser will achieve investment results that are substantially more or less favorable than those results achieved by the Fund.

To seek to reduce potential conflicts of interest and to attempt to allocate such investment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner, the investment adviser has implemented allocation policies and procedures. These policies and procedures are intended to give all clients of the investment adviser, including the Fund, fair access to investment opportunities consistent with the requirements of organizational documents, investment strategies, applicable laws and regulations, and the fiduciary duties of the investment adviser. Each client of the investment adviser that is subject to the allocation policies and procedures, including the Fund, is assigned an investment team and portfolio manager(s) by the investment adviser. The investment team and portfolio managers review investment opportunities and will decide with respect to the allocation of each opportunity considering various factors and in accordance with the allocation policies and procedures. The allocation policies and procedures are subject to change. Investors should note that the conflicts inherent in making such allocation decisions may not always be resolved to the advantage of the Fund.

It is possible that Morgan Stanley or an Affiliated Investment Account, including another Morgan Stanley Fund, will invest in or advise (in the case of Morgan Stanley) a company that is or becomes a competitor of a company of which the Fund holds an investment. Such investment could create a conflict between the Fund, on the one hand, and Morgan Stanley or the Affiliated Investment Account, on the other hand. In such a situation, Morgan Stanley may also have a conflict in the allocation of its own resources to the portfolio investment. Furthermore, certain Affiliated Investment Accounts will be focused primarily on investing in other funds which may have strategies that overlap and/or directly conflict and compete with the Fund.

In addition, certain investment professionals who are involved in the Fund’s activities remain responsible for the investment activities of other Affiliated Investment Accounts managed by the investment adviser and its affiliates, and they will devote time to the management of such investments and other newly created Affiliated Investment Accounts (whether in the form of funds, separate accounts or other vehicles), as well as their own investments. In

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Potential Conflicts of Interest — continued

addition, in connection with the management of investments for other Affiliated Investment Accounts, members of Morgan Stanley and its affiliates may serve on the boards of directors of or advise companies which may compete with the Fund’s portfolio investments. Moreover, these Affiliated Investment Accounts managed by Morgan Stanley and its affiliates may pursue investment opportunities that may also be suitable for the Fund.

It should be noted that Morgan Stanley may, directly or indirectly, make large investments in certain of its Affiliated Investment Accounts, and accordingly Morgan Stanley’s investment in the Fund may not be a determining factor in the outcome of any of the foregoing conflicts. Nothing herein restricts or in any way limits the activities of Morgan Stanley, including its ability to buy or sell interests in, or provide financing to, equity and/or debt instruments, funds or portfolio companies, for its own accounts or for the accounts of Affiliated Investment Accounts or other investment funds or clients in accordance with applicable law.

Different clients of the investment adviser and its affiliates, including the Fund, may invest in (1) different classes of securities of the same issuer (including, without limitation, different parts of an issuer's capital structure), depending on the respective clients’ investment objectives and policies and/or (2) the same class of securities of the same issuer while seeking different investment objectives or executing different investment strategies (such as long-term v. short-term investment horizons), and the investment adviser may face conflicts with respect to the interests involved. As a result, the investment adviser and its affiliates, at times, will seek to satisfy fiduciary obligations to certain clients owning one / the same class of securities of a particular issuer by pursuing or enforcing rights on behalf of those clients with respect to such (class of) securities, and those activities may have an adverse effect on another client which owns a different class of securities of such issuer. For example, if one client holds debt securities of an issuer and another client holds equity securities of the same issuer, if the issuer experiences financial or operational challenges, the investment adviser and its affiliates may seek a liquidation of the issuer on behalf of the client that holds the debt securities, whereas the client holding the equity securities may benefit from a reorganization of the issuer. Thus, in such situations, the actions taken by the investment adviser or its affiliates on behalf of one client can negatively impact securities held by another client. Alternatively, for example, if a client owns a security while seeking short-term capital appreciation that investment adviser may vote proxies or engage with the issuer (as applicable) in pursuit of that goal – which could negatively impact clients who hold the same security but are seeking long-term capital appreciation. These conflicts also exist as between the investment adviser’s clients, including the Fund, and the Affiliated Investment Accounts managed by the investment adviser’s investment adviser affiliates.

In addition, in certain circumstances, the investment adviser restricts, limits or reduces the amount of the Fund’s investment, or restricts the type of governance or voting rights it acquires or exercises, where the Fund (potentially together with Morgan Stanley) exceeds a certain ownership interest, or possesses certain degrees of voting or control or has other interests.

The investment adviser and its affiliates may give advice and recommend securities to other clients which may differ from advice given to, or securities recommended or bought for, the Fund even though such other clients’ investment objectives may be similar to those of the Fund and the investment adviser may make decisions for the Fund that may be more beneficial to one type of shareholder than another.

The investment adviser and its affiliates manage long and short portfolios. The simultaneous management of long and short portfolios creates conflicts of interest in portfolio management and trading in that opposite directional positions may be taken in client accounts, including client accounts managed by the same investment team, and creates risks such as: (i) the risk that short sale activity could adversely affect the market value of long positions in one or more portfolios (and vice versa) and (ii) the risks associated with the trading desk receiving opposing orders in the same security simultaneously. The investment adviser and its affiliates have adopted policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to mitigate these conflicts. In certain circumstances, the investment adviser invests on behalf of itself in securities and other instruments that would be appropriate for, held by, or may fall within the investment guidelines of its clients, including the Fund. At times, the investment adviser may give advice or take action for its own accounts that differs from, conflicts with, or is adverse to advice given or action taken for any client.

From time to time, conflicts also arise due to the fact that certain securities or instruments may be held in some client accounts, including the Fund, but not in others, or that client accounts may have different amounts of holdings in certain securities or instruments. In addition, due to differences in the investment strategies or restrictions among client accounts, the investment adviser may take action with respect to one account that differs from the action taken with respect to another account. In some cases, a client account may compensate the investment adviser based on the performance of the securities held by that account or pay a higher overall fee rate. The existence of such a performance based fee or higher fee rates may create additional conflicts of interest for the investment adviser in the allocation of management time, resources and investment opportunities. The investment adviser has adopted several policies and procedures designed to address these potential conflicts including a code of ethics and policies that govern the investment adviser’s trading practices, including, among other things, the aggregation and allocation of trades among clients, brokerage allocations, cross trades and best execution.

In addition, at times an investment team will give advice or take action with respect to the investments of one or more clients that is not given or taken with respect to other clients with similar investment programs, objectives, and strategies. Accordingly, clients with similar strategies will not always hold the same securities or instruments or achieve the same performance. The investment adviser’s investment teams also advise clients with conflicting programs, objectives or strategies. These conflicts also exist as between the investment adviser’s clients, including the Fund, and the Affiliated Investment Accounts managed by the investment adviser’s investment adviser affiliates.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Potential Conflicts of Interest — continued

From time to time, the investment adviser or its affiliates may provide opportunities to Affiliated Investment Accounts (including potentially the Fund) or other clients to make investments in companies (such as in equity, debt or other securities issued by companies) or to engage in transactions involving companies (such as refinancing, restructuring or other transactions) in which certain Affiliated Investment Accounts (including potentially the Fund) or other clients have already invested. These investments can create conflicts of interest, including those associated with the assets of the Fund potentially providing value to, or otherwise supporting the investments of, other Affiliated Investment Accounts or other clients and potentially diluting or otherwise adversely affecting the Fund previously invested in the company.

Morgan Stanley and its affiliates maintain separate trading desks that operate independently of each other and do not share information with the investment adviser. The Morgan Stanley and affiliate trading desks may compete against the investment adviser trading desks when implementing buy and sell transactions, possibly causing certain Affiliated Investment Accounts to pay more or receive less for a security than other Affiliated Investment Accounts.

Investments by Separate Investment Departments. For the investment adviser and certain of its investment adviser affiliates, the entities and individuals that provide investment-related services can differ by client, investment function, or business line (each, an “Investment Department” and collectively, the “Investment Departments”). Nonetheless, Investment Departments (with certain exceptions) can engage in discussions and share information and resources with another Investment Department (or a team within the other Investment Department) regarding investment-related matters. The sharing of information and resources between the Investment Departments is designed to further increase the knowledge and effectiveness of each Investment Department. However, an investment team’s decisions as to the use of shared research and participation in discussions with another Investment Department could adversely impact a client. Certain investment teams within one Investment Department could make investment decisions and execute trades together with investment teams within other Investment Departments. Other investment teams make investment decisions and execute trades independently. This could cause the quality and price of execution, and the performance of investments and accounts, to vary. Internal policies and procedures set forth the guidelines under which securities and securities trades can be crossed, aggregated, and coordinated between accounts serviced by different Investment Departments. Internal policies and procedures take into consideration a variety of factors, including the primary market in which such security trades. If a security or securities trade is ineligible for crossing, aggregation, or other coordinated trading, then each Investment Department will execute such trades independently of the other.

Payments to Broker-Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. The investment adviser, Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (the “Distributor”) and/or their affiliates may pay compensation, out of their own funds and not as an expense of the Fund, to certain Financial Intermediaries (which may include affiliates of the investment adviser and the Distributor), including recordkeepers and administrators of various deferred compensation plans, in connection with the sale, distribution, marketing and retention of shares of the Fund and/or shareholder servicing. For example, the investment adviser or the Distributor may pay additional compensation to a Financial Intermediary for, among other things, promoting the sale and distribution of Fund shares, providing access to various programs, mutual fund platforms or preferred or recommended mutual fund lists that may be offered by a Financial Intermediary, granting the Distributor access to a Financial Intermediary’s financial advisors and consultants, providing assistance in the ongoing education and training of a Financial Intermediary’s financial personnel, furnishing marketing support, maintaining share balances and/or for sub-accounting, recordkeeping, administrative, shareholder or transaction processing services. Such payments are in addition to any distribution fees, shareholder servicing fees and/or transfer agency fees that may be payable by the Fund. The additional payments may be based on various factors, including level of sales (based on gross or net sales or some specified minimum sales or some other similar criteria related to sales of the Fund and/or some or all other Morgan Stanley Funds), amount of assets invested by the Financial Intermediary’s customers (which could include current or aged assets of the Fund and/or some or all other Morgan Stanley Funds), the Fund’s advisory fee, some other agreed upon amount or other measures as determined from time to time by the investment adviser and/or the Distributor. The amount of these payments may be different for different Financial Intermediaries. In certain cases, payments to broker-dealers and other Financial Intermediaries may be shared by and among the investment adviser, the Distributor and their affiliates.

The prospect of receiving, or the receipt of, additional compensation, as described above, by Financial Intermediaries may provide such Financial Intermediaries and their financial advisors and other salespersons with an incentive to favor sales of shares of the Fund over other investment options with respect to which these Financial Intermediaries do not receive additional compensation (or receives lower levels of additional compensation). These payment arrangements, however, will not change the price that an investor pays for shares of the Fund or the amount that the Fund receives to invest on behalf of an investor. Investors may wish to take such payment arrangements into account when considering and evaluating any recommendations relating to Fund shares and should review carefully any disclosures provided by Financial Intermediaries as to their compensation.

The additional compensation received by a given Financial Intermediary from the investment adviser and/or the Distributor may vary from the additional compensation received by the Financial Intermediary in respect of an Affiliated Investment Account managed by an affiliate of the investment adviser or principally underwritten by an affiliate of the Distributor. In such circumstances, differences in the prospect of receiving, or the receipt of, additional compensation, as described above, by Financial Intermediaries may provide such Financial Intermediaries and their financial advisors and other salespersons with an incentive to favor sales of shares of one Affiliated Investment Account over other investment options with respect to which these Financial Intermediaries do not receive additional compensation (or receives lower levels of additional compensation).

Morgan Stanley Trading and Principal Investing Activities. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, Morgan Stanley will generally conduct its sales and trading businesses, publish research and analysis, and render investment advice without regard for the Fund’s holdings, although these activities could have an adverse impact on the value of one or more of the Fund’s investments, or could cause Morgan Stanley to have an interest in one or more portfolio investments that is different from and potentially adverse to that of the Fund. Furthermore, from time to time, the investment adviser or its affiliates may

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Potential Conflicts of Interest — continued

invest “seed” capital in a Fund, typically to enable such Fund to commence investment operations and/or achieve sufficient scale, as further described below. The investment adviser and its affiliates may hedge such seed capital exposure by investing in derivatives or other instruments expected to produce offsetting exposure. Such hedging transactions, if any, would occur outside of such Fund.

Morgan Stanley’s sales and trading, financing and principal investing businesses (whether or not specifically identified as such, and including Morgan Stanley’s trading and principal investing businesses) will not be required to offer any investment opportunities to the Fund. These businesses may encompass, among other things, principal trading activities as well as principal investing.

Morgan Stanley’s sales and trading, financing and principal investing businesses have acquired or invested in, and in the future may acquire or invest in, minority and/or majority control positions in equity or debt instruments of diverse public and/or private companies. Such activities may put Morgan Stanley in a position to exercise contractual, voting or creditor rights, or management or other control with respect to securities or loans of portfolio investments or other issuers, and in these instances Morgan Stanley may, in its discretion and subject to applicable law, act to protect its own interests or interests of clients, and not the Fund’s interests.

Subject to the limitations of applicable law, the Fund may purchase from or sell assets to, or make investments in, companies in which Morgan Stanley has or may acquire an interest, including as an owner, creditor or counterparty.

Morgan Stanley’s Investment Banking and Other Commercial Activities. Morgan Stanley advises clients on a variety of mergers, acquisitions, restructuring, bankruptcy and financing transactions. Morgan Stanley may act as an advisor to clients, including other investment funds that may compete with the Fund and with respect to investments that the Fund may hold. Morgan Stanley may give advice and take action with respect to any of its clients or proprietary accounts that may differ from the advice given, or may involve an action of a different timing or nature than the action taken, by the Fund. Morgan Stanley may give advice and provide recommendations to persons competing with the Fund and/or any of the Fund’s investments that are contrary to the Fund’s best interests and/or the best interests of any of its investments.

Morgan Stanley could be engaged in financial advising, whether on the buy-side or sell-side, or in financing or lending assignments that could result in Morgan Stanley’s determining in its discretion or being required to act exclusively on behalf of one or more third parties, which could limit the Fund’s ability to transact with respect to one or more existing or potential investments. Morgan Stanley may have relationships with third-party funds, companies or investors who may have invested in or may look to invest in portfolio companies, and there could be conflicts between the Fund’s best interests, on the one hand, and the interests of a Morgan Stanley client or counterparty, on the other hand.

To the extent that Morgan Stanley advises companies in financial restructurings outside of, prior to or after filing for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or similar laws in other jurisdictions, the investment adviser’s flexibility in making investments in such restructurings on the Fund’s behalf, or participating on steering committees and other committees in connection with existing investments, may be limited.

Morgan Stanley could provide investment banking services to competitors of portfolio companies, as well as to private equity and/or private credit funds; such activities may present Morgan Stanley with a conflict of interest vis-a-vis the Fund’s investment and may also result in a conflict in respect of the allocation of investment banking resources to portfolio companies.

To the extent permitted by applicable law, Morgan Stanley may provide a broad range of financial services to companies in which the Fund invests, including strategic and financial advisory services, interim acquisition financing and other lending and underwriting or placement of securities, and Morgan Stanley generally will be paid fees (that may include warrants or other securities) for such services. Morgan Stanley will not share any of the foregoing interest, fees and other compensation received by it (including, for the avoidance of doubt, amounts received by the investment adviser) with the Fund, and any advisory fees payable will not be reduced thereby.

Morgan Stanley may be engaged to act as a financial advisor to a company in connection with the sale of such company, or subsidiaries or divisions thereof, may represent potential buyers of businesses through its mergers and acquisition activities and may provide lending and other related financing services in connection with such transactions. Morgan Stanley’s compensation for such activities is usually based upon realized consideration and is usually contingent, in substantial part, upon the closing of the transaction. Under these circumstances, the Fund may be precluded from participating in a transaction with or relating to the company being sold or participating in any financing activity related to merger or acquisition.

The involvement or presence of Morgan Stanley in the investment banking and other commercial activities described above (or the financial markets more broadly) may restrict or otherwise limit investment opportunities that may otherwise be available to the Fund. For example, issuers may hire and compensate Morgan Stanley to provide underwriting, financial advisory, placement agency, brokerage services or other services and, because of limitations imposed by applicable law and regulation, the Fund may be prohibited from buying or selling securities issued by those issuers or participating in related transactions or otherwise limited in its ability to engage in such investments.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Potential Conflicts of Interest — continued

In addition, in situations where the investment adviser is required to aggregate its positions with those of other Morgan Stanley business units for position limit calculations, the investment adviser may have to refrain from making investments due to the positions held by other Morgan Stanley business units or their clients. There may be other situations where the investment adviser refrains from making an investment or refrains from taking certain actions related to the management of such investment due to, among other reasons, additional disclosure obligations, regulatory requirements, policies, and reputational risk, or the investment adviser may limit purchases or sales of securities in respect of which Morgan Stanley is engaged in an underwriting or other distribution capacity.

Morgan Stanley’s Marketing Activities. Morgan Stanley is engaged in the business of underwriting, syndicating, brokering, administering, servicing, arranging and advising on the distribution of a wide variety of securities and other investments in which the Fund may invest. Subject to the restrictions of the 1940 Act, including Sections 10(f) and 17(e) thereof, the Fund may invest in transactions in which Morgan Stanley acts as underwriter, placement agent, syndicator, broker, administrative agent, servicer, advisor, arranger or structuring agent and receives fees or other compensation from the sponsors of such products or securities. Any fees earned by Morgan Stanley in such capacity will not be shared with the investment adviser or the Fund. Certain conflicts of interest, in addition to the receipt of fees or other compensation, would be inherent in these transactions. Moreover, the interests of one of Morgan Stanley’s clients with respect to an issuer of securities in which the Fund has an investment may be adverse to the investment adviser’s or the Fund’s best interests. In conducting the foregoing activities, Morgan Stanley will be acting for its other clients and will have no obligation to act in the investment adviser’s or the Fund’s best interests. Due to the restrictions of the 1940 Act, the Fund may be restricted from participating in certain transactions in which Morgan Stanley acts as underwriter, placement agent, syndicator, broker, administrative agent, servicer, advisor, arranger or structuring agent, including transactions that would otherwise be beneficial to the Fund.

Client Relationships. Morgan Stanley has existing and potential relationships with a significant number of corporations, institutions and individuals. In providing services to its clients, Morgan Stanley may face conflicts of interest with respect to activities recommended to or performed for such clients, on the one hand, and the Fund, its shareholders or the entities in which the Fund invests, on the other hand. In addition, these client relationships may present conflicts of interest in determining whether to offer certain investment opportunities to the Fund.

In acting as principal or in providing advisory and other services to its other clients, Morgan Stanley may engage in or recommend activities with respect to a particular matter that conflict with or are different from activities engaged in or recommended by the investment adviser on the Fund’s behalf.

Principal Investments. There may be situations in which the Fund’s interests may conflict with the interests of one or more general accounts of Morgan Stanley and its affiliates or accounts managed by Morgan Stanley or its affiliates. This may occur because these accounts hold public and private debt and equity securities of many issuers which may be or become portfolio companies, or from whom portfolio companies may be acquired.

Transactions with Portfolio Companies of Affiliated Investment Accounts. The companies in which the Fund may invest may be counterparties to or participants in agreements, transactions or other arrangements with portfolio companies or other entities of portfolio investments of Affiliated Investment Accounts (for example, a company in which the Fund invests may retain a company in which an Affiliated Investment Account invests to provide services or may acquire an asset from such company or vice versa). Certain of these agreements, transactions and arrangements involve fees, servicing payments, rebates and/or other benefits to Morgan Stanley or its affiliates. For example, portfolio entities may, including at the encouragement of Morgan Stanley, enter into agreements regarding group procurement and/or vendor discounts. Morgan Stanley and its affiliates may also participate in these agreements and may realize better pricing or discounts as a result of the participation of portfolio entities. To the extent permitted by applicable law, certain of these agreements may provide for commissions or similar payments and/or discounts or rebates to be paid to a portfolio entity of an Affiliated Investment Account, and such payments or discounts or rebates may also be made directly to Morgan Stanley or its affiliates. Under these arrangements, a particular portfolio company or other entity may benefit to a greater degree than the other participants, and the Morgan Stanley Funds, investment vehicles and accounts (which may or may not include the Fund) that own an interest in such entity will receive a greater relative benefit from the arrangements than the Morgan Stanley Funds, investment vehicles or accounts that do not own an interest therein. Fees and compensation received by portfolio companies of Affiliated Investment Accounts in relation to the foregoing will not be shared with a Fund or offset advisory fees payable.

Investments in Portfolio Investments of Other Funds. To the extent permitted by applicable law, when the Fund invests in certain companies or other entities, other funds affiliated with the investment adviser may have made or may be making an investment in such companies or other entities. Other funds that have been or may be managed by the investment adviser may invest in the companies or other entities in which the Fund has made an investment. Under such circumstances, the Fund and such other funds may have conflicts of interest (e.g., over the terms, exit strategies and related matters, including the exercise of remedies of their respective investments). If the interests held by the Fund are different from (or take priority over) those held by such other funds, the investment adviser may be required to make a selection at the time of conflicts between the interests held by such other funds and the interests held by the Fund.

Investments in Morgan Stanley Funds and Other Funds. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Fund may invest in a fund affiliated with the investment adviser or its affiliates or a fund advised by the investment adviser or its affiliates. In connection with any such investments, an investing Fund, to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, will pay all advisory, administrative and/or Rule 12b-1 fees applicable to the investment. Investments by a Fund in a fund affiliated with the investment adviser or its affiliates or a fund advised by the investment adviser or its affiliates present potential conflicts of interest, including potential incentives to invest in smaller or newer funds to increase asset levels or provide greater viability. The investment adviser voluntarily waives advisory fees of a Fund associated with investments by the Fund in a fund advised by the investment adviser or its affiliates which will reduce, but will not eliminate, these types of conflicts.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Potential Conflicts of Interest — continued

The Affiliated Investment Accounts (including the Funds) may, individually or in the aggregate, own a substantial percentage of a Fund. Further, the Adviser, its affiliates, or another entity (i.e., a seed investor) may invest in the Funds at or near the establishment of such Funds, which may facilitate the Funds achieving a specified size or scale. The Adviser and/or its affiliates may make payments to an investor that contributes seed capital to a Fund. Such payments may continue for a specified period of time and/or until a specified dollar amount is reached, and will be made from the assets of the Adviser and/or such affiliates (and not the applicable Fund). Seed investors may contribute all or a majority of the assets in a Fund. There is a risk that such seed investors may redeem their investments in the Fund, particularly after payments from the Adviser and/or its affiliates have ceased. Such redemptions could negatively impact a Fund’s liquidity, expenses and market price of its shares, as applicable.

Allocation of Expenses. Expenses may be incurred that are attributable to the Fund and one or more other Affiliated Investment Accounts (including in connection with issuers in which the Fund and such other Affiliated Investment Accounts have overlapping investments). The allocation of such expenses among such entities raises potential conflicts of interest. The investment adviser and its affiliates intend to allocate such common expenses among the Fund and any such other Affiliated Investment Accounts on a pro rata basis or in such other manner as the investment adviser deems to be fair and equitable or in such other manner as may be required by applicable law.

Temporary Investments. To more efficiently invest short-term cash balances held by the Fund, the investment adviser may invest such balances on an overnight “sweep” basis in shares of one or more money market funds or other short-term vehicles. It is anticipated that the investment adviser to these money market funds or other short-term vehicles may be the investment adviser (or an affiliate) to the extent permitted by applicable law, including Rule 12d1-1 under the 1940 Act. In such a case, the affiliated investment adviser may receive asset-based fees in respect of the Fund’s investment (which will reduce the net return realized by the Fund).

Transactions with Affiliates. The investment adviser and any investment sub-adviser might purchase securities from underwriters or placement agents in which a Morgan Stanley affiliate is a member of a syndicate or selling group, as a result of which an affiliate might benefit from the purchase through receipt of a fee or otherwise. Neither the investment adviser nor any investment sub-adviser will purchase securities on behalf of the Fund from an affiliate that is acting as a manager of a syndicate or selling group. Purchases by the investment adviser on behalf of the Fund from an affiliate acting as a placement agent must meet the requirements of applicable law. Furthermore, Morgan Stanley may face conflicts of interest when a Fund uses service providers affiliated with Morgan Stanley because Morgan Stanley receives greater overall fees when they are used.

Affiliated Indexes. Affiliates of the investment adviser develop, own and operate indexes (“Indexes”), and may continue to do so in the future, based on investment and trading strategies and concepts developed by the investment adviser or its affiliates (“Adviser Strategies”). Some of the Funds seek to track the performance of the Indexes. The investment adviser manages Accounts which track the same Indexes used by the Funds or which are based on the same, or substantially similar, Adviser Strategies that are used in the operation of the Indexes and the Funds. The operation of the Indexes, the Funds and the Accounts in this manner gives rise to potential conflicts of interest. For example, Accounts that track the same Indexes used by the Funds may engage in purchases and sales of securities prior to when the Index and the Funds engage in similar transactions because such Accounts may be managed and rebalanced on an ongoing basis, whereas the Funds’ portfolios are only rebalanced on a periodic or other basis subsequent to the rebalancing of the Index.

The investment adviser has adopted policies and procedures that are designed to address potential conflicts that arise in connection with the operation of the Indexes, the Funds and the Accounts. The investment adviser has established certain information barriers and other policies designed to address the sharing of information between different businesses within the investment adviser, including with respect to personnel responsible for constructing and maintaining the Indexes and those involved in decision-making for the Funds.

Valuation of the Fund’s Investments. The investment adviser performs certain valuation services related to securities and other assets held by the Fund and performs such services in accordance with its valuation policies. The investment adviser will face a conflict with respect to valuation of the Fund’s investments generally because of the effect of such valuations on the investment adviser’s fees and other compensation and performance of the Fund.

Proxy Voting by the Adviser. The investment adviser has implemented processes designed to prevent conflicts of interest from influencing proxy voting decisions that it makes on behalf of advisory clients, including the Funds, and to help ensure that such decisions are made in accordance with its fiduciary obligations to its clients. Notwithstanding such proxy voting processes, proxy voting decisions made by the investment adviser in respect of securities held by the Fund may benefit the interests of Morgan Stanley and/or accounts other than the Fund. Further, the investment adviser may make different proxy voting decisions in respect of the same security held by clients with different investment objectives or strategies.

Potential Conflict of Interest Related to Use of Sub-Adviser(s). To the extent the Fund’s investment adviser engages affiliated and/or unaffiliated sub-advisers, the investment adviser generally expects to compensate the sub-adviser out of the advisory fee it receives from the Fund, which creates an incentive for the investment adviser to select sub-adviser(s) with lower fee rates or to select affiliated sub-adviser(s). In addition, a sub-adviser may have interests and relationships that create actual or potential conflicts of interest related to their management of Fund assets allocated to or managed by the sub-adviser. These conflicts may be similar to or different from the conflicts described herein related to Morgan Stanley and its investment advisory affiliates. For additional information about potential conflicts of interest for each sub-adviser(s) can be found in the relevant sub-adviser’s Form ADV. A copy of Part 1 and Part 2 of a sub-adviser’s Form ADV is available on the SEC’s website (www.adviserinfo.sec.gov).

Electronic Communication Networks and Alternative Trading Systems. The investment adviser’s affiliate(s) have ownership interests in and/or board seats on electronic communication networks (“ECNs”) or other alternative trading systems (“ATSs”). In certain instances the investment adviser’s affiliate(s) could be deemed to control one or more of such ECNs or ATSs based on the level of such ownership interests and whether such affiliates are represented on the

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance

Municipal Income Trust

November 30, 2025

Potential Conflicts of Interest — continued

board of such ECNs or ATSs. Consistent with its fiduciary obligation to seek best execution, the Adviser may, from time to time, directly or indirectly, effect client trades through ECNs or other ATSs in which the Firm’s affiliates have or could acquire an interest or board seat. These affiliates might receive an indirect economic benefit based upon their ownership in the ECNs or other ATSs. The investment adviser will, directly or indirectly, execute through an ECN or other ATSs in which an affiliate has an interest only in situations where the Firm or the broker dealer through whom it is accessing the ECN or ATS reasonably believes such transaction will be in the best interest of its clients and the requirements of applicable law have been satisfied.

General Process for Potential Conflicts. All of the transactions described above involve the potential for conflicts of interest between the investment adviser, related persons of the investment adviser and/or their clients. The Advisers Act, the 1940 Act and ERISA impose certain requirements designed to decrease the possibility of conflicts of interest between an investment adviser and its clients. In some cases, transactions may be permitted subject to fulfillment of certain conditions. Certain other transactions may be prohibited. In addition, the investment adviser has instituted policies and procedures designed to prevent conflicts of interest from arising and, when they do arise, to ensure that it effects transactions for clients in a manner that is consistent with its fiduciary duty to its clients and in accordance with applicable law. The investment adviser seeks to ensure that potential or actual conflicts of interest are appropriately resolved taking into consideration the overriding best interests of the client.

Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Funds

IMPORTANT NOTICES

Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders. Equiniti Trust Company, LLC (“EQ”), the closed-end funds transfer agent, or your financial intermediary, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct EQ, or your financial intermediary, otherwise. If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact EQ or your financial intermediary. Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will typically be effective within 30 days of receipt by EQ or your financial intermediary.

Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) files a schedule of portfolio holdings on Part F to Form N-PORT with the SEC. Certain information filed on Form N-PORT may be viewed on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122 and by accessing the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. You may also access proxy voting information for the Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios at www.eatonvance.com/
proxyvoting.

Share Repurchase Program. The Fund's Board of Trustees has approved a share repurchase program authorizing the Fund to repurchase up to 10% of its common shares outstanding as of the last day of the prior calendar year in open-market transactions at a discount to net asset value. The repurchase program does not obligate the Fund to purchase a specific amount of shares. The Fund's repurchase activity, including the number of shares purchased, average price and average discount to net asset value, is disclosed in the Fund's annual and semi-annual reports to shareholders.

Additional Notice to Shareholders. If applicable, a Fund may also redeem or purchase its outstanding preferred shares in order to maintain compliance with regulatory requirements, borrowing or rating agency requirements or for other purposes as it deems appropriate or necessary.

Closed-End Fund Information. Eaton Vance closed-end funds make fund performance data and certain information about portfolio characteristics available on the Eaton Vance website shortly after the end of each month. Other information about the funds is available on the website. The funds’ net asset value per share is readily accessible on the Eaton Vance website. Portfolio holdings for the most recent month-end are also posted to the website approximately 30 days following the end of the month. This information is available at www.eatonvance.com on the fund information pages under “Closed-End Funds & Term Trusts.”

	November 30, 2025
Assets
Investments, at value (identified cost $616,795,386)	$631,593,066
Interest receivable	8,552,255
Receivable for investments sold	115,000
Trustees' deferred compensation plan	144,458
Other assets	46,926
Total assets	$640,451,705
Liabilities
Payable for floating rate notes issued	$199,543,135
Payable for when-issued securities	5,621,627
Due to custodian	3,782
Payable to affiliates:
Investment adviser fee	207,903
Administration fee	103,952
Trustees' fees	6,665
Trustees' deferred compensation plan	144,458
Interest expense and fees payable	1,455,674
Accrued expenses	257,050
Total liabilities	$207,344,246
Net Assets	$433,107,459
Sources of Net Assets
Common shares, $0.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized	$398,678
Additional paid-in capital	469,389,900
Accumulated loss	(36,681,119)
Net Assets	$433,107,459
Common Shares Issued and Outstanding	39,867,820
Net Asset Value Per Common Share
Net assets ÷ common shares issued and outstanding	$10.86

	Year Ended
	November 30, 2025
Investment Income
Interest income	$30,197,814
Total investment income	$30,197,814
Expenses
Investment adviser fee	$2,481,644
Administration fee	1,240,822
Trustees’ fees and expenses	40,952
Custodian fee	108,895
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees	17,050
Legal and accounting services	161,688
Printing and postage	150,596
Interest expense and fees	6,189,787
Miscellaneous	112,788
Total expenses	$10,504,222
Net investment income	$19,693,592
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
Net realized gain (loss):
Investment transactions	$(11,750,878)
Net realized loss	$(11,750,878)
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation):
Investments	$(7,519,242)
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)	$(7,519,242)
Net realized and unrealized loss	$(19,270,120)
Net increase in net assets from operations	$423,472

	Year Ended November 30,
	2025	2024
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
From operations:
Net investment income	$19,693,592	$17,986,785
Net realized loss	(11,750,878)	(3,043,065)
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)	(7,519,242)	21,831,853
Net increase in net assets from operations	$423,472	$36,775,573
Distributions to common shareholders	$(19,433,602)	$(17,847,996)
Tax return of capital to shareholders	$(5,002,394)	$(4,786,087)
Capital share transactions:
Proceeds from shelf offering, net of offering costs (see Note 5)	$1,965,403	$—
Reinvestment of distributions to common shareholders	235,540	—
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions	$2,200,943	$—
Net increase (decrease) in net assets	$(21,811,581)	$14,141,490
Net Assets
At beginning of year	$454,919,040	$440,777,550
At end of year	$433,107,459	$454,919,040


Please print exact name on account

Shareholder signature	Date

Shareholder signature	Date
Please sign exactly as your common shares are registered. All persons whose names appear on the share certificate must sign.